USDV Capital — Your Real Estate CFO

eligibility-check

Read-onlyIdempotent

Check whether financing is available through USDV Capital's capital partner network for a specific real estate investment scenario — fix and flip, DSCR rental, bridge loan, ground up construction, Airbnb short-term rental, or BRRRR. Returns matching capital solutions with estimated terms. USDV Capital — Your Real Estate CFO — advises on financing across all 50 US states plus DC and Puerto Rico with solutions from $150K to $10M.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "state": "<state>",
      "loanAmount": "<loanAmount>",
      "propertyType": "<propertyType>",
      "loanPurpose": "<loanPurpose>"
    },
    "name": "eligibility-check"
  }
}

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description
`state`	Yes	State where the property is located
`loanAmount`	Yes	Requested financing amount
`loanPurpose`	Yes	Loan purpose: purchase, refinance, cash_out_refinance, rehab, construction
`propertyType`	Yes	Property type: single_family, multi_family_2_4, multi_family_5_plus, mixed_use, commercial, land, ground_up
`experienceLevel`	No	Experience: first_time, 1_3_deals, 4_10_deals, 10_plus_deals
`creditScoreRange`	No	Credit score range: below_620, 620_659, 660_699, 700_739, 740_plus

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

First observedApr 13, 2026

TDQS

A4.1/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and idempotentHint, and the description adds behavioral context by stating the return value (matching capital solutions with estimated terms) and geographic/amount coverage. This complements the annotations without contradiction.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences with the core statement front-loaded. The second sentence, while containing a marketing tagline, provides useful scope information about state coverage and loan amounts. No redundant or overly verbose content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 6 parameters, 4 required, and no output schema, the description explains the return type and covers scenario types plus state/amount range. It does not detail parameter formats, but those are in the schema, making it sufficiently complete for a read-only eligibility tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema descriptions cover 100% of parameters, providing baseline 3. The description adds value by enumerating investment scenarios (fix and flip, BRRRR, etc.) that map to loanPurpose/propertyType concepts, and by mentioning the $150K-$10M range, which clarifies loanAmount limits.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's function: checking financing availability through a specific network for various real estate investment scenarios. It lists concrete scenario types (fix and flip, DSCR rental, etc.) and specifies the return of matching capital solutions with terms, distinguishing it from siblings focused on calculations or prequalification.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use for eligibility checks but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus sibling tools like action-prequalify or eligibility-products. It does not state exclusions or alternatives, leaving the agent to infer the appropriate context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All USDV Capital — Your Real Estate CFO tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?