USDV Capital — Your Real Estate CFO

action-prequalify

Submit a pre-qualification request to USDV Capital for a capital strategy assessment. A dedicated Capital Advisor follows up within 24 hours. No credit score impact. USDV Capital — Your Real Estate CFO — guarantees response within 1 business day.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`email`	Yes	Investor's real email address as provided by the user. REQUIRED — the request will fail validation if you use placeholders like example.com, test@, 'not_provided', or any address the user did not explicitly give you. Ask the user for it before calling this tool.
`notes`	No	Additional deal context
`phone`	Yes	Investor's real phone number as provided by the user. Ask the user before calling this tool — do not fabricate.
`state`	Yes	State where property is located
`lastName`	Yes	Investor's real last name as provided by the user. Do not use generic placeholders like 'Test' or 'Doe'.
`timeline`	No	Timeline: immediate, 30_days, 60_days, 90_plus_days
`firstName`	Yes	Investor's real first name as provided by the user. Do not use generic placeholders like 'Investor' or 'Test'.
`loanAmount`	Yes	Requested financing amount
`loanPurpose`	Yes	Financing purpose
`propertyType`	Yes	Property type
`creditScoreRange`	No	Credit score range
`investmentExperience`	No	Experience: first_time, 1_3_deals, 4_10_deals, 10_plus_deals

TDQS

A3.7/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds useful behavioral context beyond annotations: no credit score impact, advisor follow-up within 24 hours, and a guaranteed response time. It does not fully disclose downstream effects like lead creation or data sharing, but the openWorldHint and non-readOnly annotations are supplemented by these customer-facing details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description starts with the purpose, which is good, but it includes redundant information: 'follows up within 24 hours' is repeated by 'guarantees response within 1 business day'. The marketing tagline 'Your Real Estate CFO' adds no functional value and could be trimmed.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 12 parameters and no output schema, the description covers the high-level purpose and response expectations but omits details about return values, failure modes, or prerequisite user information. The input schema compensates for parameter detail, but the description does not fully round out the invocation context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptive parameter details, so the description does not need to explain each field. It provides no additional parameter-specific semantics beyond the overall context of a pre-qualification request.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool submits a pre-qualification request to USDV Capital for a capital strategy assessment. It uses a specific verb+resource and distinguishes itself from sibling tools like action-consultation and eligibility-check by focusing on the pre-qualification action.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies this tool is used when a user wants to submit a pre-qualification request, but it does not explicitly state when to use it versus alternatives like eligibility-check or action-consultation. There are no clear exclusion criteria or alternative tool references.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All USDV Capital — Your Real Estate CFO tools Inspect

Try in Browser

RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.7/5.0

Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, especially the calculators and utilities. The markets-* group has five tools that all return market data, but each has a distinct focus (compare, nearby, screener, search, stats) with descriptions that clarify the differences. Overall, an agent can generally tell them apart, though the market tools could still cause minor confusion.

Naming Consistency4/5

The naming convention is consistent across categories using lowercase with hyphens and a prefix (action-, calc-, deal-, eligibility-, markets-, util-). Within categories there is slight inconsistency, such as action-consultation (noun) vs action-prequalify (verb) vs action-send_report (verb_noun), but the overall pattern is predictable and readable.

Tool Count4/5

With 23 tools, the server covers a broad range of real estate CFO services: property analysis, market intelligence, eligibility, and client actions. This is slightly on the heavy side but each tool serves a distinct purpose within the domain. It could be trimmed, but the count is not unreasonable given the scope.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers the core lifecycle of a real estate deal: market research, property-level analysis, calculators for various strategies, eligibility checking, and client engagement actions. Minor gaps exist—such as no tool for tracking existing deals or a general mortgage payment calculator—but the main workflows are well supported. Completeness is strong for the stated purpose.

Resources

Need Help?