Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is only 22%, so the tool description must compensate for the 18 parameters. It lists several search-strategy parameters by name, but adds little meaning beyond the property names, and it omits the required rail_name semantics, active, priority, reason, tenant_id, owner_profile_id, and the nested objects. It also mentions 'travel posture', which does not appear anywhere in the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.