Skip to main content
Glama

set_client_self_cancel_enabled

Allow or block clients from cancelling their own subscription in the app. (confirm-gated: previews until confirm: true)

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "enabled": "<enabled>"
    },
    "name": "set_client_self_cancel_enabled"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
confirmNoMust be true to actually execute. If false/omitted, returns a preview only.
enabledYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

readOnlyHint=false already tells the agent this mutates state; the description usefully adds the confirm-gating behavior, though the schema's own confirm description already states the preview semantics, so this is partly repetition. It does not disclose what permissions are required, whether the setting is org-wide or plan-scoped, or whether existing client cancellations in flight are affected.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, zero filler, with the core action front-loaded and the confirm-gating caveat placed after it. Every clause earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a two-parameter boolean toggle with no output schema, the description is nearly sufficient. The absence of a client identifier in the schema implies an org-level policy, which the description's plural 'clients' is consistent with, but the scope is never stated outright.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 50%: confirm is fully documented in the schema, while enabled has no schema description. The description's 'allow or block' does map enabled=true/false to a concrete meaning, which partially compensates. Baseline 3 is appropriate given the partial coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb pair (allow/block) and a precise resource: clients cancelling their own subscription in the app. This is clearly distinct from sibling cancel_client_subscription, which performs the cancellation rather than toggling the policy. It stops short of naming that sibling explicitly, so a 4 rather than a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is only implied by the verb: an agent can infer this is the policy toggle for client self-cancellation. There is no explicit when-to-use vs. when-not, no mention of prerequisites (e.g., plan/org scope), and no pointer to the related cancel_client_subscription tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.