Skip to main content
Glama

remove_gym_custom_domain

Destructive

Disconnect a gym's custom domain. (confirm-gated: previews until confirm: true)

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "organizationId": "<organizationId>"
    },
    "name": "remove_gym_custom_domain"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
confirmNoMust be true to actually execute. If false/omitted, returns a preview only.
organizationIdYesGym id (from list_my_organizations)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only supply destructiveHint=true; the description adds genuinely new behavior — the call is confirm-gated and returns a preview unless confirm:true is passed. That is exactly the kind of non-obvious trait an agent needs. It still omits what actually happens on execution (DNS/SSL teardown, whether the domain is released) and permission requirements, so it is not a 5.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short clauses, no waste, and the core action is front-loaded ahead of the parenthetical behavior note. Nothing to trim.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a two-parameter mutation with full schema coverage and destructiveHint, the description covers the essentials including the two-phase preview/execute flow. It lacks post-removal consequences and required permissions, which would matter for a destructive org-level operation, but the gaps are modest.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so both parameters are already fully documented, including the confirm semantics and the organizationId source (list_my_organizations). The description restates the confirm gating rather than adding new parameter meaning. Baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: "Disconnect a gym's custom domain." The word "gym" implies organization-scoped operation, which separates it from remove_my_custom_domain in the sibling list, but that distinction is never made explicit. An agent can tell what the tool does, just not fully why it differs from the near-identical sibling.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the name and the confirm-gating note, but the description never says when to prefer this over remove_my_custom_domain or the connect/refresh siblings. There are no exclusions or prerequisites (e.g. domain must be connected, org admin required).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.