Skip to main content
Glama

join_session_video_call

Get the join URL/token for the video call of a booked 1:1 session. (confirm-gated: previews until confirm: true)

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "sessionId": "<sessionId>"
    },
    "name": "join_session_video_call"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
confirmNoMust be true to actually execute. If false/omitted, returns a preview only.
sessionIdYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only give readOnlyHint=false, which the description reconciles by disclosing the confirm-gated preview behavior — a useful detail. However it says nothing about token lifetime, whether joining consumes minutes, or what happens when the session is not yet started, which matter for an action-adjacent tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, front-loaded with the outcome before the gating caveat; no filler. The parenthetical is compact and relevant.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema exists, and the description does tell the agent the return is a join URL/token, which covers the basics. It omits failure conditions and side effects relevant to a tool marked non-read-only, leaving gaps for a 2-parameter action tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 50%: 'confirm' is fully described in the schema, and the description merely restates the gating. 'sessionId' has no schema description and the description only weakly implies it identifies the booked 1:1 session, adding little new meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Get the join URL/token for the video call') and scopes it to a 'booked 1:1 session', which implicitly separates it from join_gym_class_video_call and start_instant_video_call. It stops short of naming those siblings explicitly, so an agent must infer the boundary.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'booked 1:1 session' implies the precondition, but there is no explicit statement of when to prefer this over get_video_call_access or join_gym_class_video_call, and no mention of whether the session must be at/near its scheduled time.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.