Skip to main content
Glama

delete_client_workout_log

Destructive

Delete one logged workout entry (use ids from get_client_workout_logs). (confirm-gated: previews until confirm: true)

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "id": "<id>"
    },
    "name": "delete_client_workout_log"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYes
confirmNoMust be true to actually execute. If false/omitted, returns a preview only.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true, and the description usefully adds that deletion is confirm-gated and returns only a preview until confirm is true. It does not describe permissions, irreversibility, or post-deletion effects, so it is not fully comprehensive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, front-loaded with the action and followed by required id source and confirm-gating details. No sentence is wasted.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive single-record tool, the description covers the essential safety behavior through confirm gating and identifies the id source. It does not mention permissions or downstream effects, but with destructiveHint present and no output schema, it is largely complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The confirm parameter is documented in the schema, and the description reinforces its gating behavior. The id parameter has no schema description, but the description partially compensates by saying ids come from get_client_workout_logs; overall value is modest because schema coverage is only 50%.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: 'Delete one logged workout entry.' It also points to the sibling tool that supplies the required ids, so the agent can distinguish this from log-fetching siblings without opening schemas.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives a clear prerequisite by naming get_client_workout_logs as the source of ids. It also explains the confirm-gated execution model, though it does not explicitly state when not to use this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.