Skip to main content
Glama

add_community_comment

Comment on a community post as the coach. (confirm-gated: previews until confirm: true)

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "postId": "<postId>",
      "text": "<text>"
    },
    "name": "add_community_comment"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
textYes
postIdYes
confirmNoMust be true to actually execute. If false/omitted, returns a preview only.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only declare readOnlyHint=false, so the description carries real weight here, and it delivers the key trait: the call is confirm-gated and merely previews until confirm: true. It does not cover permission requirements (coach-only scoping) or what the preview contains, keeping it below 5.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, front-loaded with the action and followed by the one behavioral caveat that matters. Nothing is redundant with the schema or annotations.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation tool with no output schema and sparse annotations, the description covers the crucial confirm-gate and the actor identity. What a preview returns and any associated notifications or visibility rules are left unstated, so it is nearly but not fully complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is only 33%, with descriptions only on confirm. The description usefully reinforces that confirm: true is what flips preview into execution, but postId and text get no added meaning beyond their schema types and length constraints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Comment on a community post') plus the acting identity ('as the coach'), which cleanly separates it from create_community_post, react_to_community_post, and delete_community_comment. It stops short of explicitly naming those siblings, so it is clear but not maximally differentiated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the resource and the coach persona, but the description never says when to comment instead of reacting or posting, nor any preconditions such as needing to be a member of the community. The reader must infer the choice from the sibling list.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.