Skip to main content
Glama

get_monthly_books_review

Read-only

Month-end summary of the user's books for one calendar month: income recorded, money spent, net, top spending categories and merchants, plus alerts for anything unusual that month. Examples: 'how did last month go', 'close out my books for June', 'monthly review', 'what did I make and spend in May'. Defaults to the last completed month. Figures come from the user's own recorded data; advisory notes are estimates, not tax advice. closeReadiness summarizes current recorded-book checks and Action Needed categories with authenticated app links. Explain unknown coverage and limitations; it does not close books or certify tax completeness.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
periodNoCalendar month in YYYY-MM format. Defaults to the last completed month.
clientEmailNoClient account email. Accountants may use this only for an accepted ExpenseBot client.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataNo
messageNo
successYes
closeReadinessNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / closeReadiness
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "actionNeeded": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "additionalProperties": true,
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "checks": {
      +      "additionalProperties": {
      +        "enum": [
      +          "ready",
      +          "needs_action",
      +          "blocked",
      +          "unknown",
      +          "not_applicable"
      +        ],
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "status": {
      +      "enum": [
      +        "ready",
      +        "needs_action",
      +        "blocked",
      +        "unknown"
      +      ],
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "data": {
      +      "additionalProperties": true,
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "message": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "success": {
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "success"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -{
      -  "additionalProperties": true,
      -  "description": "Standard ExpenseBot tool result envelope. `message` is the human-readable summary the AI cites; `data` is the structured payload (totals, breakdowns, ids, etc.). On failure, `success` is false and `error` carries a code/message/hint triple.",
      -  "properties": {
      -    "data": {
      -      "additionalProperties": true,
      -      "description": "Structured payload. Shape varies per tool — common keys: total, breakdown, comparison, sampleMeta, ids, expenseId, reportId, signupUrl, results.",
      -      "type": "object"
      -    },
      -    "error": {
      -      "additionalProperties": true,
      -      "description": "Present only when success === false.",
      -      "properties": {
      -        "code": {
      -          "type": "string"
      -        },
      -        "hint": {
      -          "type": "string"
      -        },
      -        "message": {
      -          "type": "string"
      -        }
      -      },
      -      "type": "object"
      -    },
      -    "message": {
      -      "description": "Human-readable result text. Always present on success; prefer rendering this verbatim before any further reasoning.",
      -      "type": "string"
      -    },
      -    "sampleMeta": {
      -      "additionalProperties": true,
      -      "description": "Set when the underlying dataset was truncated. isTruncated=true means the agent saw a sample of `sampleCount` of `totalCount` rows; aggregate totals are still accurate.",
      -      "properties": {
      -        "isTruncated": {
      -          "type": "boolean"
      -        },
      -        "sampleCount": {
      -          "type": "integer"
      -        },
      -        "totalCount": {
      -          "type": "integer"
      -        }
      -      },
      -      "type": "object"
      -    },
      -    "success": {
      -      "description": "False on tool errors; check before reading `data`.",
      -      "type": "boolean"
      -    }
      -  },
      -  "type": "object"
      -}New value: +null
  4. First observed

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the readOnly/openWorld/destructive annotations, the description discloses provenance ('figures come from the user's own recorded data'), reliability caveats ('advisory notes are estimates, not tax advice'), and explicit non-capabilities ('it does not close books or certify tax completeness'). It also explains what closeReadiness contains (recorded-book checks, Action Needed categories, authenticated app links), which the annotations alone would not convey.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The purpose and scope are front-loaded, then contents, examples, defaults, and caveats follow in a logical order. It is dense and slightly run-on in the trailing sentences about closeReadiness and unknown coverage, but nearly every sentence carries distinct information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, return-value detail is not required, and the description still covers defaults, data provenance, advisory-vs-authoritative distinctions, and the closeReadiness summary field. For a two-optional-param read-only review tool, nothing an agent needs to invoke it correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so both parameters (period format, clientEmail scope) are already documented in the schema, and the description only restates the default-month behavior. The accountant-restriction note on clientEmail also appears in the schema, so the description adds essentially no parameter meaning beyond structured fields — the baseline 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific verb+resource ('Month-end summary of the user's books for one calendar month') and enumerates the exact contents (income recorded, money spent, net, top categories/merchants, alerts). Its scope — a single calendar month defaulting to the last completed month — clearly separates it from sibling tools like get_pnl, get_spending_summary, and get_income_summary, which are not month-scoped reviews.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Concrete user-utterance examples ('how did last month go', 'close out my books for June', 'monthly review') give clear context for when to invoke it, and the clientEmail note scopes accountant use. It never names an alternative tool or states when NOT to use this one, so it stops short of a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.