industry_comparison
Compare a company's financial metrics against its industry averages
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| ticker | Yes | Stock ticker symbol |
Compare a company's financial metrics against its industry averages
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| ticker | Yes | Stock ticker symbol |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description does not disclose which metrics are compared, how averages are computed, or any potential side effects. Vague behavioral context.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, minimal waste, clear and direct. Appropriate length for the tool's simplicity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema and lacks description of return format, specific metrics, or limitations. Agent cannot predict what output to expect, making it incomplete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Only one parameter (ticker) with full schema coverage. Description adds context (compare against industry) but schema already explains ticker. Baseline 3.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the action (compare), subject (company's financial metrics), and reference (industry averages). Distinct from siblings like get_all_financial_data and compare_companies.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives, no prerequisites, when-not-to-use, or context. Agent must infer from sibling names.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.