Skip to main content
Glama

workmine_catalog

Browse the complete WORKMINE catalog for free: paid API names, exact USDC-denominated prices, HTTP methods and URLs. Use this when comparing available tools; use find_workmine_tool when you already have a natural-language task. This catalog call itself does not execute or purchase a paid API.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "workmine_catalog"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full behavioral burden. It discloses that the catalog is free and that calling it does not execute or purchase anything, which is the key safety profile for a read-only catalog. It does not detail authentication needs or rate limits, but for a no-parameter catalog read this is minor.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tightly written sentences front-load the core purpose and then route the agent to the correct sibling tool. Every clause contributes useful information without repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that the tool has no parameters, has full schema coverage for those zero parameters, and has an output schema to describe return values, the description supplies everything else an agent needs: what the catalog returns, when to use it versus the sibling, and that it has no purchase side effect.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so per the scoring rule the baseline is 4. The description appropriately says nothing about parameters because none exist.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource ('Browse the complete WORKMINE catalog') and enumerates exactly what the catalog contains: paid API names, USDC prices, HTTP methods, and URLs. It explicitly distinguishes itself from the sibling tool find_workmine_tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives an explicit when-to-use condition ('when comparing available tools') and names the alternative tool for a different condition ('use find_workmine_tool when you already have a natural-language task'). It also clarifies that the call does not execute or purchase a paid API, removing ambiguity.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.