Skip to main content
Glama

List limit orders

list_limit_orders
Read-only

List a wallet's CoW limit orders on one chain with status (open, fulfilled, cancelled, expired), amounts filled and an explorer link. Result includes display markdown with chan images: show it to the user. How to combine this with the other tools: swapchan_playbook (workflows: find-money, best-swap, rebalance, revoke-approvals, bridge-stuck, token-safety, recover-old-wallet).

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "chainId": "<chainId>",
      "owner": "<owner>"
    },
    "name": "list_limit_orders"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
ownerYesEVM address
chainIdYesChain id where CoW runs: 1 Ethereum, 8453 Base, 42161 Arbitrum, 137 Polygon, 56 BNB, 43114 Avalanche, 59144 Linea

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and openWorldHint, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds real behavioral guidance beyond that: the result contains a `display` field with chan images that must be shown to the user, and it enumerates the possible status values, which an agent needs to interpret results.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The first sentence is front-loaded and dense with useful information. The second sentence about combining with swapchan_playbook then dumps a long list of workflow names that belong to another tool, which is borderline filler for this definition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

There is no output schema, so the description carries the return-value burden, and it does reasonably well: statuses, amounts filled, explorer link, and the `display` markdown field are all named. It does not mention pagination or ordering, which is a minor gap for a list tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so both `owner` and `chainId` are already documented in the schema, including the supported chain list. The description only reinforces that the lookup is per-wallet and per-chain, adding no syntax or format detail beyond the schema — baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('List a wallet's CoW limit orders'), plus the chain scoping and the fields returned. It cleanly distinguishes from siblings like build_limit_order and cancel_limit_order by being the read/list counterpart.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It points to swapchan_playbook for higher-level workflows, which gives some routing context, but it never states when to use this tool versus siblings such as cancel_limit_order or wallet_history, nor any preconditions (e.g., that a wallet must have orders). Usage is only implied.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.