Skip to main content
Glama

Dados Abertos Senado BR MCP

Senadores afastados

senado_senadores_afastados
Read-onlyIdempotent

Lista os senadores atualmente afastados (fora de exercício). Retorna { count, senadores }, cada item com codigo, nome, nomeCompleto, partido, uf, foto e emExercicio (sempre false). Não requer parâmetros. Atenção: é a lista BRUTA do upstream, sem recorte de legislatura — pode conter registros históricos (ex.: senadores falecidos) e inconsistências pontuais com o detalhe do parlamentar; também não traz o vínculo titular↔suplente (para saber quem assumiu a vaga, consulte os mandatos em senado_obter_senador). Use codigo em senado_obter_senador para o detalhe; para os senadores em exercício (e busca por nome) use senado_listar_senadores.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
  2. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
    • changedOutput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / additionalProperties
      Previous value: -trueNew value: +{}
  4. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "properties": {},
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  5. First observed

TDQS

A4.8/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover the safety profile (readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive, openWorld), yet the description adds substantial non-obvious context: it is the raw upstream list with no legislature filtering, may include historical/deceased records and inconsistencies, and lacks the titular↔suplente link. These caveats go well beyond what the annotations disclose.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loads purpose, then return shape, then caveats, then routing alternatives. It is dense but every sentence carries functional value (return fields, caveats, sibling routing), with little waste despite its length.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the output schema exists, return-value explanation is optional, yet the description adds the shape, field list, and the `emExercicio` (always false) invariant. Combined with the caveats and routing, an agent has everything needed to call and interpret this correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Zero parameters, so baseline is 4; the description confirms 'Não requer parâmetros' but adds no further semantic detail beyond what the empty schema already conveys. Nothing more is needed or possible here.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Lista os senadores atualmente afastados (fora de exercício)') and explicitly distinguishes the tool from its closest siblings (senado_listar_senadores for in-exercise senators, senado_obter_senador for detail). An agent can identify the resource and its scope without opening any schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Names the alternatives and the condition selecting each: use `codigo` in `senado_obter_senador` for detail, and `senado_listar_senadores` for senators in exercise plus name search. This gives explicit routing rather than leaving the agent to infer.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.