Skip to main content
Glama

Dados Abertos Senado BR MCP

Discursos no plenário

senado_discursos_plenario
Read-onlyIdempotent

Lista todos os discursos realizados em plenário num período de datas (dataInicio/dataFim obrigatórias, formato YYYYMMDD). Retorna { periodo, count, discursos }, cada item com codigo, data, casa, tipoUsoPalavra, resumo, indexacao, url, nomeParlamentar, codigoParlamentar, partido e uf. Para discursos de um parlamentar específico use senado_discursos_senador; obtenha o texto integral com senado_discurso_texto.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataFimYesData fim (YYYYMMDD)
dataInicioYesData início (YYYYMMDD)

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
  2. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
    • changedOutput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
  3. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -false
    • changedOutput schema / additionalProperties
      Previous value: -trueNew value: +{}
  4. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "properties": {},
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  5. First observed

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly/idempotent/non-destructive/openWorld, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds the mandatory date-range constraint with format and sketches the returned payload shape, which is genuine extra context; it stops short of pagination or result-size behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three tight sentences: scope first, then output shape, then sibling routing. No filler, and the most decision-relevant information is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be explained in depth, yet the description still names the top-level keys. Combined with full parameter documentation and explicit sibling routing, nothing needed to call this tool correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and both parameters already carry type, pattern and format descriptions. The description's mention of dataInicio/dataFim as required in YYYYMMDD restates what the schema already says, adding no new semantics, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Lista todos os discursos realizados em plenário') plus the scoping dimension (date range). It explicitly distinguishes itself from the two closest siblings, senado_discursos_senador and senado_discurso_texto, so an agent can route without opening schemas.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives explicit alternatives and the condition that selects each: use senado_discursos_senador for a specific parliamentarian, senado_discurso_texto for the full text. This is exactly the when/when-not routing an agent needs.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.