Skip to main content
Glama

Pesquisas do IBGE

ibge_pesquisas
Read-onlyIdempotent

Lists available IBGE surveys and their tables.

Features:

  • List all IBGE surveys (Census, PNAD, GDP, etc.)

  • Search by name or code

  • Show details and tables of a specific survey

  • Categorize surveys by theme

Main surveys:

  • Census: Demographic, Agricultural, MUNIC

  • PNAD Contínua: Employment, income, education

  • National Accounts: GDP, investments

  • Economic Surveys: Industry, Commerce, Services

  • Price Indices: IPCA, INPC

Examples:

  • List all: (no parameters)

  • Search population: busca="população"

  • PNAD details: detalhes="pnad"

This lists surveys, not data. To find table codes use ibge_sidra_tabelas; to query data use ibge_sidra (or a wrapper: ibge_censo, ibge_indicadores, ibge_comparar, ibge_cidades).

Behavior: read-only and idempotent — a live GET against the public IBGE SIDRA/Pesquisas API. Returns a Markdown list.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
buscaNoTermo para buscar no nome ou ID da pesquisa
detalhesNoCódigo da pesquisa para ver detalhes e tabelas disponíveis

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
modoYesModo de consulta que originou este resultado: lista de pesquisas ou detalhes de uma
buscaNoTermo de busca aplicado, se houver (modo lista)
totalNoTotal de pesquisas encontradas (modo lista)
pesquisaNoDetalhes de uma pesquisa específica (modo detalhes)
pesquisasNoLista de pesquisas (modo lista)
provenanceYesBloco de proveniência (contrato v1.1): fonte, URL, período, extração, diagnóstico de origem e licença
attributionYesURLs canônicas das fontes desta resposta (lista de atribuição)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / provenance / description
      Previous value: -"Bloco de proveniência (contrato v1.0): fonte, URL, período, extração e licença"New value: +"Bloco de proveniência (contrato v1.1): fonte, URL, período, extração, diagnóstico de origem e licença"
    • addedOutput schema / properties / provenance / properties / retrieval
      Added value: +{
      +  "anyOf": [
      +    {
      +      "additionalProperties": false,
      +      "properties": {
      +        "anomalies": {
      +          "description": "Anomalias superadas até o sucesso, somadas por classe, em ordem fixa; [] se nenhuma",
      +          "items": {
      +            "additionalProperties": false,
      +            "properties": {
      +              "count": {
      +                "description": "Ocorrências desta classe na chamada",
      +                "maximum": 9007199254740991,
      +                "minimum": 1,
      +                "type": "integer"
      +              },
      +              "kind": {
      +                "description": "Classe da anomalia (vocabulário fechado do contrato)",
      +                "enum": [
      +                  "timeout",
      +                  "network",
      +                  "http_4xx",
      +                  "http_5xx",
      +                  "rate_limited",
      +                  "malformed_body"
      +                ],
      +                "type": "string"
      +              }
      +            },
      +            "required": [
      +              "kind",
      +              "count"
      +            ],
      +            "type": "object"
      +          },
      +          "type": "array"
      +        },
      +        "attempts": {
      +          "description": "Tentativas somadas, incluindo as repetidas (>= requests)",
      +          "maximum": 9007199254740991,
      +          "minimum": 1,
      +          "type": "integer"
      +        },
      +        "requests": {
      +          "description": "Idas distintas à origem que compõem esta resposta (fatias, páginas)",
      +          "maximum": 9007199254740991,
      +          "minimum": 1,
      +          "type": "integer"
      +        },
      +        "unstable": {
      +          "description": "true se houve repetição (attempts > requests) ou alguma anomalia",
      +          "type": "boolean"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "required": [
      +        "requests",
      +        "attempts",
      +        "anomalies",
      +        "unstable"
      +      ],
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    {
      +      "type": "null"
      +    }
      +  ],
      +  "description": "Diagnóstico de origem desta chamada (contrato v1.1): idas à API do IBGE, tentativas somadas e anomalias contornadas; unstable=true quando houve anomalia. null quando nada foi medido (resposta servida só do cache)"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / properties / provenance / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "source",
      -  "source_url",
      -  "data_vintage",
      -  "retrieved_at",
      -  "citation",
      -  "license"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "source",
      +  "source_url",
      +  "data_vintage",
      +  "retrieved_at",
      +  "retrieval",
      +  "citation",
      +  "license"
      +]
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
  3. First observed

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, destructiveHint=false and openWorldHint, yet the description still adds value: it discloses that this is a live GET against the public IBGE SIDRA/Pesquisas API and that output is a Markdown list. It does repeat the read-only/idempotent traits already in annotations, which keeps it short of a 5.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loads the core purpose, then layers features, examples and routing in a scannable structure. The 'Main surveys' taxonomy block is longer than strictly necessary for tool selection, but it is genuinely useful context for a survey-catalog tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists so return values need no explanation; the description still covers purpose, inputs, examples, sibling routing, and the underlying API behavior. For a zero-required-parameter read-only listing tool, nothing an agent needs to invoke it correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3, and the description rises above it by supplying worked examples that map each parameter to realistic values ('busca="população"', 'detalhes="pnad"') and clarifying the no-parameter case lists everything. It does not, however, state matching behavior (partial vs exact) for busca.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Lists available IBGE surveys and their tables') and immediately scopes it against siblings: 'This lists surveys, not data.' An agent can distinguish it from ibge_sidra_tabelas and ibge_sidra without opening any schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly routes the agent: use ibge_sidra_tabelas to find table codes, ibge_sidra or a wrapper to query data. It also gives concrete when-to-use examples ('Search population: busca="população"'). Nothing is left to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.