list_posts
荻野のブログ記事の一覧(タイトル・日付・要約・URL)を新しい順に返す。
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | 件数上限(既定20) |
荻野のブログ記事の一覧(タイトル・日付・要約・URL)を新しい順に返す。
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | 件数上限(既定20) |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, so description carries full burden. It discloses return fields, ordering, and list behavior. Could mention if it returns only published posts or rate limits, but overall sufficient for a read tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, front-loaded with key information. No redundant words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple list tool with one optional parameter and no output schema, the description covers essential behavioral aspects. Could mention authentication or scope, but not critical.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 100% coverage with description for 'limit'. Description adds value by specifying returned fields, but does not add semantics beyond what schema provides for the parameter.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states it returns a list of blog posts with specific fields (title, date, summary, URL) ordered newest first. This distinguishes it from siblings like get_post (single post) and search.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives such as search or get_post. The purpose is implied, but no when-not or exclusion criteria are provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.