Skip to main content
Glama

Backtesting Arena

Connection, Auth & Quota Status

arena_status
Read-only

Am I connected, and what can this key do? Returns auth status (key kind: oauth connector or bearer API key, tier), server version, current UTC time, and the rate-limit state (hour/day used, remaining, reset) WITHOUT consuming extra quota beyond this call itself. Call this first when other tools fail: it separates auth problems (reconnect), tier problems (upgrade) and rate limits (wait) from real outages. [Free tier]

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "arena_status"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

readOnlyHint=true is consistent with a pure status read. Beyond that, the description adds non-obvious behavior: the call does not consume quota beyond itself, and it is tagged '[Free tier]'. It also discloses the field-level contents of the response, which matters since there is no output schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with the question the agent is actually asking, then the payload, then the failure-triage guidance, then the cost tag. Three sentences, each carrying distinct information, no filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description carries the return-value burden and does so by listing every field. Combined with the quota note and the triage guidance, an agent has everything needed to call this and interpret the result without a follow-up.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes no parameters, so there is nothing to disambiguate; the schema is an empty object and the description correctly says nothing about inputs. Baseline 4 applies for a zero-parameter tool.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Opens with a plain-language question and then enumerates exactly what is returned: auth status (key kind: oauth connector vs bearer key, tier), server version, UTC time, and rate-limit state. No sibling in the list does anything similar, so an agent can immediately separate this diagnostic tool from the data-fetching tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states when to call it: 'Call this first when other tools fail', and then gives a decision map — auth problems (reconnect), tier problems (upgrade), rate limits (wait), real outages. This is exactly the when-to-use/alternatives guidance the dimension rewards.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.