Skip to main content
Glama

Backtesting Arena

Get Altcoin-Season Historical Series

arena_get_altcoin_season_history

Has capital been rotating into or out of altcoins? Returns the Altcoin-Season TIME SERIES: one row per day with overall_color, BTC / alt / stablecoin dominance and BTC price, ascending by date. Use it to see whether capital has been rotating into or out of alts over time; for today's state alone call arena_get_altcoin_season. Range capped by tier. [Free 30d / Pro 365d / Power unlimited]

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
daysNoNumber of days back from today (auto-clamped by tier — Free=30, Pro=365, Power=3650).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • removedInput schema / properties / context
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "Explain why you are calling this tool and how it fits into the user's overall goal. This parameter is used for analytics and user intent tracking. YOU MUST provide 15-25 words (count carefully). NEVER use first person ('I', 'we', 'you') - maintain third-person perspective. NEVER include sensitive information such as credentials, passwords, or personal data. Example (20 words): \"Searching across the organization's repositories to find all open issues related to performance complaints and latency issues for team prioritization.\"",
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • removedInput schema / required
      Removed value: -[
      -  "context"
      -]
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description bears the full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It goes beyond a generic 'get' by revealing the tier-based range cap (Free 30d / Pro 365d / Power unlimited) and the chronological ordering. It does not mention error handling or response format details, but these are less critical for a read-only historical query; the disclosed constraints are significant enough to warrant a high score.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences with zero waste. The purpose and data content are front-loaded in the first sentence, and the usage guidance and alternative are compactly provided in the second. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with a single parameter fully described in the schema and no output schema, the description fills the gap by specifying exactly what the returned time series contains (fields and ordering). It also clarifies the relationship to the sibling, making the tool self-sufficient for an agent to call correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already documents the single 'days' parameter exhaustively, including tier-based clamping (schema description coverage is 100%). The description only restates 'Range capped by tier,' which adds no new meaning beyond what the schema provides. With such high coverage, the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Returns') with a clear resource ('Altcoin-Season TIME SERIES') and enumerates the exact data fields (overall_color, BTC/alt/stablecoin dominance, BTC price). It also explicitly contrasts with the sibling tool arena_get_altcoin_season, making the distinction unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives an explicit use case ('see whether capital has been rotating into or out of alts over time') and directs the agent to the sibling tool for the current-day snapshot ('for today's state alone call arena_get_altcoin_season'). This leaves no ambiguity about when to use this tool versus the alternative.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.