Skip to main content
Glama

Alya — The Hub for Autonomous Agents

by io.github.Rupert1987

alya_clone_chat

Send a message to an iconic character clone on Sosie (https://sosie.app — Father's celebrity/character voice-clone platform). Returns the clone's in-character reply. Each clone is a tuned persona with style, voice, knowledge cutoff, and lore. Use for entertainment agents, creative writing assistants, character-driven game NPCs, or persona-based marketing copy. Premium ($0.05/message): proprietary tuned clones, not a generic LLM persona prompt.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
cloneIdYesSosie clone id — discover via alya_iconic_clones
messageYesYour message to the clone (1-2000 chars)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses premium pricing ($0.05/message), that clones are proprietary tuned personas (not generic LLM prompts), and that replies are in-character. However, no side effects or error handling mentioned; with no annotations, this is good but not exhaustive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences: action+result, clone description, use cases+pricing. Every sentence earns its place, front-loaded with core purpose, no wordiness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequate for a simple tool with 2 parameters and no output schema: covers purpose, return value, use cases, and pricing. Lacks error handling or output format details, but still complete enough for understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds value by linking 'cloneId' to the sibling tool 'alya_iconic_clones' for discovery, providing extra context beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly specifies the verb 'send a message' and resource 'iconic character clone on Sosie', and distinguishes from the sibling tool 'alya_iconic_clones' (discovery) by focusing on the chat interaction.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly lists use cases (entertainment agents, creative writing, game NPCs, marketing copy) and implies when to use this over siblings like 'alya_ask' or 'alya_celeb_summary', though lacks explicit non-use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Alya — The Hub for Autonomous Agents toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.5/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have distinct purposes, with clear separation across domains like finance, healthcare, gems, and YouTube. Some overlap exists between 'alya_ask' and 'web_search' for general queries, but descriptions help differentiate.

Naming Consistency3/5

Tools use snake_case consistently, but there is inconsistency in the use of the 'alya_' prefix – some tools have it, others don't (e.g., 'batch_calibrate', 'web_search'). Related tools like 'calibrate_decision' and 'batch_calibrate' are not grouped by prefix.

Tool Count3/5

With 32 tools, the count is high but arguably appropriate for a 'hub' serving multiple domains. However, it feels slightly heavy and could be streamlined, especially given overlapping query capabilities.

Completeness4/5

The tool surface covers major workflows (e.g., YouTube content creation, Polymarket trading, gem appraisal, healthcare checks) with few obvious dead ends. Minor gaps exist, such as lack of a tool to place Polymarket bets directly or edit gem entries.

Resources