Skip to main content
Glama

Agent directory (Gopher-over-HTTPS)

seneschal_agent_directory

Terse, drill-down discovery index of this ecosystem (Seneschal, FlashBank, winbit32, secresea, ZecBus, Zecmon, Ziving, McPai) plus a LIVE mirror of the official MCP registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io) — the same directory served over HTTPS at https://seneschal.space/.well-known/agent.gopher, callable here so you never leave the MCP session. Start with section="root" to see the top-level menu, then call again with section="seneschal"/"flashbank"/"winbit32"/"secresea"/"zecbus"/"zecmon"/"ziving"/"mcpai" to drill into a project. Each project exposes About / Agents / Actions — drill them with section="/about", "/agents" or "/actions" (e.g. "winbit32/actions"). Seneschal additionally drills into its own services with section="seneschal/" where is one of private-watch, checkout, oracle, paymaster, board, ironwood, mcp — every website + MCP capability, grouped and priced. section="registry" browses connectable third-party MCP servers (use cursor to page); section="about"/"agents" is the directory’s own prose. format="gopher" (default) is the compact RFC-1436 menu; format="json" returns a structured {title, items[]}. A discovery layer, not a replacement for MCP — use it to FIND tools, then connect. Free, no payment.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
cursorNoPagination cursor for the "registry" section, taken from a previous "More servers" entry.
formatNo"gopher" (default) = compact menu text; "json" = structured {title, items[]}.
sectionNoWhich directory node to fetch. Default "root". Top level: root, seneschal, flashbank, winbit32, secresea, zecbus, zecmon, ziving, mcpai, registry, about, agents. Drill a project with "<site>/about", "<site>/agents" or "<site>/actions" (e.g. "winbit32/actions"). Seneschal also exposes per-service sections: "seneschal/private-watch", "seneschal/checkout", "seneschal/oracle", "seneschal/paymaster", "seneschal/board", "seneschal/ironwood", "seneschal/mcp".

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / section / description
      Previous value: -"Which directory node to fetch. Default \"root\". Top level: root, seneschal, flashbank, winbit32, secresea, zecbus, zecmon, ziving, bitid, mcpai, registry, about, agents. Drill a project with \"<site>/about\", \"<site>/agents\" or \"<site>/actions\" (e.g. \"winbit32/actions\"). Seneschal also exposes per-service sections: \"seneschal/private-watch\", \"seneschal/checkout\", \"seneschal/oracle\", \"seneschal/shovels\", \"seneschal/builder\", \"seneschal/data\", \"seneschal/paymaster\", \"seneschal/board\", \"seneschal/ironwood\", \"seneschal/mcp\"."New value: +"Which directory node to fetch. Default \"root\". Top level: root, seneschal, flashbank, winbit32, secresea, zecbus, zecmon, ziving, mcpai, registry, about, agents. Drill a project with \"<site>/about\", \"<site>/agents\" or \"<site>/actions\" (e.g. \"winbit32/actions\"). Seneschal also exposes per-service sections: \"seneschal/private-watch\", \"seneschal/checkout\", \"seneschal/oracle\", \"seneschal/paymaster\", \"seneschal/board\", \"seneschal/ironwood\", \"seneschal/mcp\"."
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / section / description
      Previous value: -"Which directory node to fetch. Default \"root\". Top level: root, seneschal, flashbank, winbit32, secresea, zecbus, registry, about, agents. Drill a project with \"<site>/about\", \"<site>/agents\" or \"<site>/actions\" (e.g. \"winbit32/actions\"). Seneschal also exposes per-service sections: \"seneschal/private-watch\", \"seneschal/checkout\", \"seneschal/oracle\", \"seneschal/shovels\", \"seneschal/builder\", \"seneschal/data\", \"seneschal/paymaster\", \"seneschal/board\", \"seneschal/ironwood\", \"seneschal/mcp\"."New value: +"Which directory node to fetch. Default \"root\". Top level: root, seneschal, flashbank, winbit32, secresea, zecbus, zecmon, ziving, bitid, mcpai, registry, about, agents. Drill a project with \"<site>/about\", \"<site>/agents\" or \"<site>/actions\" (e.g. \"winbit32/actions\"). Seneschal also exposes per-service sections: \"seneschal/private-watch\", \"seneschal/checkout\", \"seneschal/oracle\", \"seneschal/shovels\", \"seneschal/builder\", \"seneschal/data\", \"seneschal/paymaster\", \"seneschal/board\", \"seneschal/ironwood\", \"seneschal/mcp\"."
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / section / description
      Previous value: -"Which directory node to fetch. Default \"root\". Top level: root, seneschal, flashbank, winbit32, secresea, zecbus, registry, about, agents. Drill a project with \"<site>/about\", \"<site>/agents\" or \"<site>/actions\" (e.g. \"winbit32/actions\"). Seneschal also exposes per-service sections: \"seneschal/private-watch\", \"seneschal/oracle\", \"seneschal/shovels\", \"seneschal/builder\", \"seneschal/data\", \"seneschal/paymaster\", \"seneschal/board\", \"seneschal/mcp\"."New value: +"Which directory node to fetch. Default \"root\". Top level: root, seneschal, flashbank, winbit32, secresea, zecbus, registry, about, agents. Drill a project with \"<site>/about\", \"<site>/agents\" or \"<site>/actions\" (e.g. \"winbit32/actions\"). Seneschal also exposes per-service sections: \"seneschal/private-watch\", \"seneschal/checkout\", \"seneschal/oracle\", \"seneschal/shovels\", \"seneschal/builder\", \"seneschal/data\", \"seneschal/paymaster\", \"seneschal/board\", \"seneschal/ironwood\", \"seneschal/mcp\"."
  4. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / section / description
      Previous value: -"Which directory node to fetch. Default \"root\". Top level: root, seneschal, flashbank, winbit32, secresea, zecbus, registry, about, agents. Drill a project with \"<site>/about\", \"<site>/agents\" or \"<site>/actions\" (e.g. \"winbit32/actions\")."New value: +"Which directory node to fetch. Default \"root\". Top level: root, seneschal, flashbank, winbit32, secresea, zecbus, registry, about, agents. Drill a project with \"<site>/about\", \"<site>/agents\" or \"<site>/actions\" (e.g. \"winbit32/actions\"). Seneschal also exposes per-service sections: \"seneschal/private-watch\", \"seneschal/oracle\", \"seneschal/shovels\", \"seneschal/builder\", \"seneschal/data\", \"seneschal/paymaster\", \"seneschal/board\", \"seneschal/mcp\"."
  5. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / section / description
      Previous value: -"Which directory node to fetch. Default \"root\"."New value: +"Which directory node to fetch. Default \"root\". Top level: root, seneschal, flashbank, winbit32, secresea, zecbus, registry, about, agents. Drill a project with \"<site>/about\", \"<site>/agents\" or \"<site>/actions\" (e.g. \"winbit32/actions\")."
    • removedInput schema / properties / section / enum
      Removed value: -[
      -  "root",
      -  "seneschal",
      -  "flashbank",
      -  "winbit32",
      -  "secresea",
      -  "registry",
      -  "about",
      -  "agents"
      -]
  6. Added

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full burden. It discloses the access model ('Free, no payment'), that it mirrors the live upstream registry, that it can be invoked without leaving the MCP session, and that format="gopher" is the default. It does not mention rate limits, caching, or staleness of the mirror, which keeps it short of a 5.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Purpose and entry point are front-loaded, and each sentence is largely functional. However, it re-enumerates the full section list and the per-service list already present in the schema, which is redundant bulk for an otherwise dense paragraph.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description steps in to specify the return shapes (compact RFC-1436 gopher menu vs. structured {title, items[]}) and the default format, plus pagination via cursor. An agent has everything needed to call and interpret the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the schema description already enumerates the section values, the cursor source, and the format enum. The description mostly restates those enumerations, so it adds limited meaning beyond the schema; the one genuine addition is the drill-down composition narrative ('<site>/about', '<site>/actions'). Baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource: a 'discovery index of this ecosystem' plus a 'LIVE mirror of the official MCP registry'. It names the concrete projects it indexes and clearly separates itself from the action-oriented siblings (board_post, checkout_invoice_create, etc.), which are all operations on those sites rather than the directory itself.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives explicit navigation instructions ('Start with section="root"... then call again with section="seneschal"/...') and states the tool's role boundary: 'A discovery layer, not a replacement for MCP — use it to FIND tools, then connect.' That is a clear when-to-use and when-not-to-use statement with an implied alternative (the real MCP servers).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.