Skip to main content
Glama

Bitcoin (BTC) price in USD, EUR and other major currencies: current Bitcoin price in USD, EUR, GBP and other currencies

btc_price
Read-only

Current Bitcoin (BTC) spot price in USD, EUR, GBP, CAD, CHF, AUD and JPY, averaged across major exchanges, with the number of satoshis per US dollar and the time of the price. Use to convert between sats and fiat, to value a Bitcoin or Lightning payment, or to check the BTC price before a trade. Example: currency=SEK. Price $0.01/call via x402 USDC or a card key (/credits), first 25 free; failed calls free. Reads or computes only and changes nothing; each call is charged, so repeats are not free.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
currencyNoOptional: also price BTC in this currency; the seven listed ones come from the source, others (SEK, NOK, INR, BRL and about 25 more) are converted from USD at the ECB reference rate

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / currency
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Optional: also price BTC in this currency; the seven listed ones come from the source, others (SEK, NOK, INR, BRL and about 25 more) are converted from USD at the ECB reference rate",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • removedInput schema / properties / only
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "Optional: comma-separated top-level result keys to keep, for a smaller answer (for example only=price,symbol); unknown keys are ignored and an empty match returns the full result",
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / only / description
      Previous value: -"Optional: comma-separated top-level result keys to keep, for a smaller answer (for example only=fastestFee,halfHourFee); unknown keys are ignored and an empty match returns the full result"New value: +"Optional: comma-separated top-level result keys to keep, for a smaller answer (for example only=price,symbol); unknown keys are ignored and an empty match returns the full result"
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / only
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Optional: comma-separated top-level result keys to keep, for a smaller answer (for example only=fastestFee,halfHourFee); unknown keys are ignored and an empty match returns the full result",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  4. Added

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Goes well beyond annotations: pricing model ($0.01/call via x402 USDC or card key), first 25 free, failed calls free, and that repeated calls are charged (consistent with idempotentHint=false in a billing sense). Also confirms no side effects, aligning with readOnlyHint=true.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Dense but front-loaded: price scope and returns come first, then usage, then billing. Every sentence carries information, though the pricing sentence is long and could be trimmed slightly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description still specifies what is returned (spot prices per currency, satoshis per USD, timestamp), so an agent knows exactly what to expect. Nothing material is missing for a single-optional-param read tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is already 100%, and the description still adds value: an example (currency=SEK) and the distinction that the seven listed currencies come from the source while others are ECB-rate conversions. That clarifies output semantics beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Current Bitcoin (BTC) spot price') plus the exact currency set, averaging source, and extra returns (sats per USD, timestamp). An agent can immediately separate this from siblings like price_token or fx because it is explicitly BTC-scoped.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives three concrete use cases: converting sats to fiat, valuing a BTC/Lightning payment, and checking price before a trade. It does not name alternative sibling tools to use when you want token (non-BTC) prices, but the usage context is unambiguous.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.