Skip to main content
Glama

Find AeroCell regional eSIM plans

find_regional_esim_plans
Read-only

Find live multi-country AeroCell bundles. Supply every itinerary country as a two-letter ISO code; only bundles listing all those countries are returned. Optionally select a named region. A region-only search returns bundles with their exact country coverage.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoMaximum results, 1–20; default 8.
regionNoOptional named catalog region; check returned country_codes.
end_dateNoTrip end, YYYY-MM-DD inclusive. Provide with start_date.
start_dateNoTrip start, YYYY-MM-DD. Provide with end_date.
min_data_gbNoMinimum data allowance in GB.
country_codesNoEvery itinerary country, up to 30 distinct codes.
max_price_usdNoMaximum price in USD.
require_trip_coverageNoDefaults to true when dates are supplied; false includes shorter plans.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
noteYes
plansYes
regionYes
currencyYes
trip_daysYes
browse_urlYes
updated_atYes
total_matchingYes
requested_country_codesYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • removedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -false
  2. Changed5 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / region / enum
      Previous value: -[
      -  "global",
      -  "europe",
      -  "asia_pacific",
      -  "southeast_asia",
      -  "latin_america",
      -  "middle_east_north_africa",
      -  "gulf"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "global",
      +  "europe",
      +  "north_america",
      +  "asia_pacific",
      +  "southeast_asia",
      +  "latin_america",
      +  "middle_east_north_africa",
      +  "gulf"
      +]
    • addedOutput schema / properties / plans / items / properties / includes_calls
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / plans / items / properties / includes_sms
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / plans / items / properties / provider_details
      Added value: +{
      +  "items": {
      +    "additionalProperties": false,
      +    "properties": {
      +      "content": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "title": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "title",
      +      "content"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / properties / plans / items / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "id",
      -  "name",
      -  "data_gb",
      -  "validity_days",
      -  "price_usd",
      -  "network",
      -  "operators",
      -  "covers_trip",
      -  "plan_page_url",
      -  "checkout_url",
      -  "region_code",
      -  "country_codes",
      -  "country_count"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "id",
      +  "name",
      +  "data_gb",
      +  "validity_days",
      +  "price_usd",
      +  "network",
      +  "operators",
      +  "covers_trip",
      +  "includes_calls",
      +  "includes_sms",
      +  "provider_details",
      +  "plan_page_url",
      +  "checkout_url",
      +  "region_code",
      +  "country_codes",
      +  "country_count"
      +]
  3. First observed

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, openWorld and non-destructive, so the description is free to add real semantics — the AND-match rule across country_codes, the fact that a region-only search returns exact country coverage, and that results are "live" bundles. It adds no auth, rate-limit, or pagination context, which is the remaining gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three tightly written sentences, front-loaded with the verb and resource, then the required input rule, then the optional mode. No repetition of schema or annotation content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema, full annotation coverage and 100% schema descriptions carry most of the load, and the description covers the non-obvious matching logic. The interaction between country_codes and region when both are provided is the one behavioral detail an agent must still guess at.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so 3 is the baseline; the description earns above that by explaining the conjunctive matching semantics of country_codes and the returned coverage for region-only queries. It does not clarify what happens when both country_codes and region are supplied (narrow vs. override), which is the one semantic still ambiguous.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ("Find live multi-country AeroCell bundles") and the multi-country qualifier immediately separates it from find_esim_plans and get_esim_plan. An agent can tell what this tool retrieves without opening the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives explicit operating instructions: pass every itinerary country as ISO codes, and bundles must list all of them to be returned; a region-only search is also described as a valid mode. It never names find_esim_plans or states when to prefer that sibling, so the routing rule is clear but not exhaustive.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources