Skip to main content
Glama

Find AeroCell eSIM plans

find_esim_plans
Read-only

Find current AeroCell travel eSIM plans for one country. Use a two-letter ISO country code. Provide both travel dates if known; plans covering the whole trip are returned by default. Optional data and USD price filters narrow results.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoMaximum results, 1–20; default 8.
end_dateNoTrip end, YYYY-MM-DD inclusive. Provide with start_date.
start_dateNoTrip start, YYYY-MM-DD. Provide with end_date.
min_data_gbNoMinimum data allowance in GB.
country_codeYesTwo-letter ISO country code, such as JP; XK is also supported by the catalog.
max_price_usdNoMaximum price in USD.
require_trip_coverageNoDefaults to true when dates are supplied; false includes shorter plans.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
noteYes
plansYes
countryYes
currencyYes
trip_daysYes
browse_urlYes
updated_atYes
total_matchingYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • removedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -false
  2. Changed4 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / plans / items / properties / includes_calls
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / plans / items / properties / includes_sms
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / plans / items / properties / provider_details
      Added value: +{
      +  "items": {
      +    "additionalProperties": false,
      +    "properties": {
      +      "content": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "title": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "title",
      +      "content"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / properties / plans / items / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "id",
      -  "name",
      -  "data_gb",
      -  "validity_days",
      -  "price_usd",
      -  "network",
      -  "operators",
      -  "covers_trip",
      -  "plan_page_url",
      -  "checkout_url"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "id",
      +  "name",
      +  "data_gb",
      +  "validity_days",
      +  "price_usd",
      +  "network",
      +  "operators",
      +  "covers_trip",
      +  "includes_calls",
      +  "includes_sms",
      +  "provider_details",
      +  "plan_page_url",
      +  "checkout_url"
      +]
  3. First observed

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare read-only, non-destructive, open-world behavior, so the description only needs to add operational context. It does so by disclosing the default filtering behavior ('plans covering the whole trip are returned by default') and how optional filters interact, though it says nothing about result ordering or empty-result behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short sentences, front-loaded with the core action and scope, then usage rules, then filter behavior. No filler or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be explained, and annotations cover the safety profile. The description is complete for calling the tool correctly; the only gap is the absence of explicit routing guidance among the three sibling search/get tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all seven parameters are already documented. The description restates the country-code format and the date/filter roles, and clarifies that coverage filtering is the default, but adds no syntax or edge-case detail the schema lacks. Baseline 3 applies when the schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Find current AeroCell travel eSIM plans') plus scope ('for one country'), which implicitly separates it from find_regional_esim_plans. It never names the sibling explicitly, so the differentiation is inferred rather than stated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives concrete usage instructions: use a two-letter ISO code, supply both travel dates if known, and use filters to narrow. It stops short of explicitly saying when to prefer find_regional_esim_plans or get_esim_plan instead.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources