Skip to main content
Glama

get_execution_config_schema

Read-onlyIdempotent

Every execution-config parameter a strategy can carry: the platform default, what it does, the effect of raising or lowering it, its legal bounds, and whether it is a strategy-character knob, an account guardrail, gated behind another flag, or retained but unused. Call it before discussing or overriding any risk parameter, so you describe the knob that exists rather than one you remember.

[Access: pay 0.001 USDC via x402 (PAYMENT-SIGNATURE header) OR authenticate with an API key. An x402-capable client will auto-pay; API-key clients pay nothing per call.]

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "get_execution_config_schema"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the read-only and idempotent annotations, the description discloses important invocation context: the tool is accessed either via x402 payment or API key, with different payment behavior for each. It also describes the substantive content returned, which is valuable because no output schema exists.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the tool's purpose and contents, then follows with a clear usage instruction and necessary access details. Despite being information-dense, every sentence contributes to understanding or safe invocation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the absence of an output schema, the description adequately explains what the tool returns: defaults, behavior, effects, bounds, and parameter categories. It also covers access requirements and when to call it, leaving no critical gaps for correct use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters and an empty schema, so the baseline is 4. The description does not need to explain parameter semantics, and it correctly focuses on the returned schema content and usage context instead.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the resource as the full execution-config parameter schema, including default values, effects, bounds, and parameter classification. The purpose is specific and understandable, though it does not explicitly contrast this schema lookup with sibling tools such as get_strategy or get_sweep_limits.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives a clear trigger: call it before discussing or overriding any risk parameter, so you describe the knob that exists rather than one you remember. This is strong contextual guidance, though it does not name alternatives or state when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.