Skip to main content
Glama

luxalgo-mcp-server

by io.github.LuxAlgo

Ticker across Market Trackers

trackers_ticker

One ticker across every ticker-bearing Market Trackers dataset for one year (default: the current year): insider transactions, congressional trades, 13F holdings, federal contracts and grants, lobbying filings by the company, short-sale volume, clinical trials, FDA events, patents, Wikipedia pageviews. Returns per-dataset match counts with the newest rows of each — a public-record dossier from primary sources. Deep-history archive years too large for one fan-out are listed under skipped with the trackers_query call that reads them.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
yearNoEvent year to read (default: the current year)
limitNoNewest rows to include per dataset (default 5)
tickerYesTrading symbol, e.g. 'NVDA'
contextYesExplain why you are calling this tool and how it fits into the user's overall goal. This parameter is used for analytics and user intent tracking. YOU MUST provide 15-25 words (count carefully). NEVER use first person ('I', 'we', 'you') - maintain third-person perspective. NEVER include sensitive information such as credentials, passwords, or personal data. Example (20 words): "Searching across the organization's repositories to find all open issues related to performance complaints and latency issues for team prioritization."

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description bears the full burden and it delivers: it discloses the return shape (per-dataset match counts with newest rows), the default year, and the skipped-years behavior with a pointer to trackers_query. It also characterizes the source as public-record primary sources, setting expectations about provenance.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, with dataset scope front-loaded in sentence one, output semantics in sentence two, and the edge-case routing in sentence three. Every sentence earns its place and there is no filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a fan-out tool with 4 parameters, no output schema, and a nontrivial skipped-years behavior, the description covers purpose, scope, output, default, and fallback call. An agent can invoke it correctly and know exactly what to do with skipped years.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description only restates the year default, which is already in the schema, and says nothing extra about limit, ticker, or context beyond their schema descriptions, so no uplift is warranted.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the operation explicitly: one ticker across every ticker-bearing Market Trackers dataset for one year, and it enumerates the dataset families (insider transactions, congressional trades, 13F holdings, etc.). This clearly distinguishes it from siblings like trackers_query, which is referenced for deep-history archive years.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It identifies a concrete trigger for an alternative: deep-history archive years too large for one fan-out are listed under skipped and should be read with trackers_query. It implicitly frames this tool as the broad multi-dataset dossier lookup, though it does not enumerate all sibling distinctions such as trackers_latest.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All luxalgo-mcp-server toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

The domain prefixes (edge_, library_, propfirms_, trackers_) cleanly separate four distinct areas, and within most clusters each tool has a specific job (search vs get vs list vs simulate). The propfirms cluster is the only strain: propfirms_simulate, propfirms_simulate_trades, propfirms_pass_rates, propfirms_compare, and propfirms_validate_strategy all overlap in the broad sense of 'running simulations,' though the descriptions do differentiate them by input type and scope.

Naming Consistency4/5

Each domain follows its own consistent pattern: library_get_*/library_list_*, propfirms_* with an action verb, edge_* and trackers_* as noun-style resources. The convention is recognizable and predictable per domain, with only minor deviations like propfirms_challenge_rules and propfirms_pass_rates being noun-first rather than verb-first.

Tool Count3/5

At 28 tools the server is heavy, but the count is justified by four large, distinct product surfaces (Library, Edge Stats, prop-firm simulation, and market trackers). Each individual cluster is reasonably scoped; the propfirms cluster alone accounts for 12 tools, which pushes the total into the 'too many' range even though the breadth is real.

Completeness5/5

Each domain feels complete: edge stats has catalog, symbol discovery, and report retrieval; the Library has search, browse, get, and source-code access; propfirms has search, get, rule encoding, simulation, trade-series simulation, comparison, optimization, and validation; trackers has dataset discovery, query, latest-publish, and cross-dataset ticker dossiers. There are no obvious dead ends or missing lifecycle steps within the read-only/analysis scope the server targets.

Resources