Skip to main content
Glama

luxalgo-mcp-server

by io.github.LuxAlgo

Get a prop firm

propfirms_get

One prop firm's full dossier by slug: general profile (platforms, markets, payments, Trustpilot, restricted countries), every challenge with its rules, live offers with promo codes and affiliate links, and the written overview (about, rules, payout policy, FAQ). Find slugs with propfirms_search. Uncaptured (null) fields are omitted; challenges reference applicable offers via offerIds into the firm-level offers list. For simulated pass odds on this firm's challenges (reference archetypes, same engine as luxalgo.com/prop-firms), use propfirms_pass_rates.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
contextYesExplain why you are calling this tool and how it fits into the user's overall goal. This parameter is used for analytics and user intent tracking. YOU MUST provide 15-25 words (count carefully). NEVER use first person ('I', 'we', 'you') - maintain third-person perspective. NEVER include sensitive information such as credentials, passwords, or personal data. Example (20 words): "Searching across the organization's repositories to find all open issues related to performance complaints and latency issues for team prioritization."
propfirmIdYesPublic firm slug, e.g. 'ftmo'

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the behavioral disclosure burden. It discloses that null fields are omitted and that challenges reference offers via offerIds, which goes beyond a simple return-value list. It does not mention failure behavior or rate limits, but for a read-only retrieval tool the disclosed behaviors are sufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is dense but each sentence earns its place: content inventory, slug lookup guidance, structural detail about nulls and offerIds, and an alternative-tool pointer. Slightly longer than minimal, but well-organized and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of an output schema and the tool's complex return payload, the description thoroughly inventories what the agent will receive: profile, challenges, offers, overview, plus relational details like offerIds and null omission. The alternative-tool pointers round it out, making it complete for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description confirms propfirmId is a slug and directs users to propfirms_search for finding valid slugs, reinforcing the schema's existing parameter description without adding significant new detail.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description identifies a specific verb and resource: fetching one prop firm's full dossier by slug. It enumerates the dossier's components, clearly distinguishing this tool from siblings like propfirms_search and propfirms_pass_rates.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly tells agents to use propfirms_search to find slugs first, and to use propfirms_pass_rates for simulated pass odds. This provides clear routing guidance and prerequisite context without leaving inference to the agent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All luxalgo-mcp-server toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

The domain prefixes (edge_, library_, propfirms_, trackers_) cleanly separate four distinct areas, and within most clusters each tool has a specific job (search vs get vs list vs simulate). The propfirms cluster is the only strain: propfirms_simulate, propfirms_simulate_trades, propfirms_pass_rates, propfirms_compare, and propfirms_validate_strategy all overlap in the broad sense of 'running simulations,' though the descriptions do differentiate them by input type and scope.

Naming Consistency4/5

Each domain follows its own consistent pattern: library_get_*/library_list_*, propfirms_* with an action verb, edge_* and trackers_* as noun-style resources. The convention is recognizable and predictable per domain, with only minor deviations like propfirms_challenge_rules and propfirms_pass_rates being noun-first rather than verb-first.

Tool Count3/5

At 28 tools the server is heavy, but the count is justified by four large, distinct product surfaces (Library, Edge Stats, prop-firm simulation, and market trackers). Each individual cluster is reasonably scoped; the propfirms cluster alone accounts for 12 tools, which pushes the total into the 'too many' range even though the breadth is real.

Completeness5/5

Each domain feels complete: edge stats has catalog, symbol discovery, and report retrieval; the Library has search, browse, get, and source-code access; propfirms has search, get, rule encoding, simulation, trade-series simulation, comparison, optimization, and validation; trackers has dataset discovery, query, latest-publish, and cross-dataset ticker dossiers. There are no obvious dead ends or missing lifecycle steps within the read-only/analysis scope the server targets.

Resources