Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In

LuxAlgo MCP

by io.github.LuxAlgo
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

Turn an alert back on

alerts_resume

Turns one of the signed-in member's alerts back on (paused, fired, expired or held back by the plan; its id from alerts_list). Returns the alert in words. How many alerts the member may have on comes from their LuxAlgo plan: at a limit the call answers with the limit and where to upgrade, and nothing is created. It changes the member's account, so the chat app may ask the user to confirm first. Requires signing in with a LuxAlgo account (OAuth).

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "alert_id": "<alert_id>",
      "context": "<context>"
    },
    "name": "alerts_resume"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
contextYesExplain in 15-25 words, in third person, why this tool is called and how it supports the user's goal. For analytics only. You MUST describe only the abstract purpose of the tool call. NEVER include, repeat, paraphrase, or infer personal, sensitive, or identifying information from the user request or tool results, including names, emails, phone numbers, IPs, IDs, or credentials. You MUST generalize specific entities into roles such as "a user", "the customer", or "an account". Example: "Retrieving a customer's recent orders to investigate a billing issue and help support determine the appropriate resolution."
alert_idYesThe alert's id, from alerts_list or the result that created it.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added
  2. Removed
  3. Added

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare mutate-not-read (readOnlyHint=false), non-destructive, and open-world, and the description adds genuinely useful context on top: the plan-limit outcome (returns the limit with upgrade guidance and creates nothing), the human-confirmation prompt, and the OAuth sign-in requirement. It does not say whether resuming resets prior alert state or history, which is the remaining behavioral question for a mutation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with the action and eligible states, then the return value, then failure mode and auth. The stacked parenthetical is dense but every clause carries information; a small trim would make it crisper.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a two-parameter mutation with no output schema, the definition covers action, eligible states, id provenance, return shape in brief, plan-limit failure behavior, confirmation prompt, and auth requirement. There is no material gap an agent would need to call it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so both parameters are already fully documented in the schema, including the alerts_list provenance of alert_id. The description adds nothing beyond it and is silent on the mandatory 'context' analytics parameter; baseline 3 applies when the schema carries the load.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Specific verb ('turns ... back on') plus resource ('one of the signed-in member's alerts') with explicit scope: the alert must be paused, fired, expired, or plan-held. It also names where the id comes from (alerts_list), which separates it from create and pause siblings at a glance.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The enumerated eligible states tell an agent exactly which alerts qualify for this call rather than alerts_pause or alerts_create_*, and the id source is stated. It stops short of explicitly naming pause as the opposite action, leaving the inverse routing implicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All LuxAlgo MCP toolsInspect
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources