Skip to main content
Glama

HeyClaude — Claude & AI workflow directory

entry.detail

Read-onlyIdempotent

Fetch a read-only HeyClaude registry entry detail payload by category and slug. By default (bodyMode='excerpt') the body markdown is trimmed to a short lead and large copyable fields are omitted to conserve context, with bodyChars/bodyTruncated/omittedFields describing what was dropped; pass bodyMode='full' for the complete content or 'none' to drop the body entirely. Use entry.asset to retrieve omitted install/script content.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
slugYesSlug of the entry to fetch.
bodyModeNoHow much entry content to return. 'excerpt' (default) trims the body markdown to a short lead and omits large copyable fields (scriptBody, fullCopyableContent, copySnippet), reporting what was dropped via bodyChars/bodyTruncated/omittedFields; 'none' also drops the body; 'full' returns everything. Use entry.asset for omitted install/script content, and request 'full' only when you truly need the complete inline content — it can be tens of kilobytes.
categoryYesCategory of the entry (e.g. 'mcp', 'skills', 'agents').

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYes
policyNo

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only indicate safety; description adds valuable detail: default bodyMode behavior, field truncation, reporting of dropped fields, and size caveat. No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three concise, front-loaded sentences: purpose, key behavior, and sibling reference. Every sentence adds essential information without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (3 params, output schema, annotations), the description covers all critical aspects: purpose, bodyMode options, size warning, and alternative for omitted content.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers 100% of parameters with descriptions. Description adds context for bodyMode: default, effect on output, and when to use each option, going beyond schema basics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Fetch a read-only HeyClaude registry entry detail payload by category and slug', providing a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling entry.asset by mentioning it for omitted content.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly tells when to use alternatives: 'Use entry.asset to retrieve omitted install/script content.' Also explains bodyMode variants and advises to request 'full' only when needed, aiding correct selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have distinct purposes, especially with clear prefixes. However, there is some overlap between entry.safety and entry.trust (both deal with safety/trust metadata), and between registry.recommend and registry.plan (both provide recommendations). The descriptions help differentiate but some ambiguity remains.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent pattern: a domain prefix (entry, install, registry, submission) followed by a descriptive noun, all lowercase with underscores. This makes the surface predictable and easy to navigate.

Tool Count4/5

27 tools is slightly high but reasonable given the broad scope of the HeyClaude registry, which includes browsing, recommending, installing guidance, and submission preparation. The count is appropriate for the server's purpose.

Completeness5/5

The tool surface is comprehensive, covering search, detail, comparison, safety/trust analysis, install setup for multiple clients, recommendation, and a full submission pipeline (validation, review, schema, etc.). There are no obvious gaps for the intended read-only registry directory functionality.