Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In

Dropspace

by io.github.JCLVSH
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

discard_persona_analysis

discard a persona's pending analysis without committing (preserves any previously saved analysis)

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "id": "<id>"
    },
    "name": "discard_persona_analysis"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYespersona ID

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false; the description corroborates and enriches this by stating that previously saved analysis is preserved, which tells the agent the discard is scoped to pending state only. It stops short of saying whether the discarded analysis is recoverable.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single tight sentence with the non-committal guarantee front-loaded inside parentheses. No filler, no repetition of the tool name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a one-parameter tool with no output schema, the description covers scope and side effects adequately. Only minor gaps remain, such as behavior when no pending analysis exists.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the single parameter is already documented as 'persona ID' in the schema. The description only restates that this acts on a persona, adding no new meaning about format or constraints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description gives a specific verb ('discard') and a precise resource ('a persona's pending analysis'), and it clarifies the operation is non-committal. It does not name a sibling such as finalize_persona or analyze_persona, so differentiation is implied rather than explicit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied: call this to throw away unsaved analysis while keeping what was previously saved. There is no explicit when-to-use versus when-not, nor a named alternative (e.g., finalize_persona) for the committing path.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Dropspace toolsInspect
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources