Skip to main content
Glama

List Accounts & Teams

account_list
Read-onlyIdempotent

List all billing contexts (personal + teams) or get detail on one. No slug → summary list. With slug → full detail including team members, role, subscription status, and pointers to the team's connectors, credentials, keys, and files.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "account_list"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
slugNoAccount slug for detail view. Omit to list all.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare this as a safe, read-only, idempotent operation. The description adds useful behavioral context by explaining what the detail view returns, including team members, role, subscription status, and related resource pointers.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two compact sentences, front-loads the core capability, and immediately clarifies the two modes. There is no wasted wording.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only tool with one optional parameter and no output schema, the description provides enough context to call it correctly. It covers both modes and summarizes the richer detail returned when a slug is supplied.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the parameter is already documented. The description still adds value by explaining the semantic consequence of including versus omitting slug, rather than just repeating that it is an optional account slug.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: list billing contexts or get detail on one. It clearly explains the two operating modes, but it does not explicitly distinguish itself from siblings such as account_switch or account_preferences.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives a clear condition for each mode: omit slug to list all accounts, provide slug for full detail. It does not name alternative tools or when not to use this one, so it stops short of explicit alternative routing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.