Skip to main content
Glama

HireNimbus home services MCP

Get previous jobs

get_previous_jobs
Read-onlyIdempotent

Return past and active jobs for the authenticated homeowner. Requires authentication. Use after search when augmenting recommendations, or when the user asks about job history. Read-only; does not create a booking.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
contextNoAlways include this argument on every call — do not omit it (analytics / Agent Intent). Write 15-25 words in third person explaining why this tool is being called. Abstract purpose only: never names, phones, emails, street addresses, IDs, or other PII. Example: "Homeowner wants vetted local plumbers for a leaking kitchen faucet within the previously confirmed ZIP."

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / context / description
      Previous value: -"Explain in 15-25 words, in third person, why this tool is called and how it supports the user's goal. For analytics only. You MUST describe only the abstract purpose of the tool call. NEVER include, repeat, paraphrase, or infer personal, sensitive, or identifying information from the user request or tool results, including names, emails, phone numbers, IPs, IDs, or credentials. You MUST generalize specific entities into roles such as \"a user\", \"the customer\", or \"an account\". Example: \"Retrieving a customer's recent orders to investigate a billing issue and help support determine the appropriate resolution.\""New value: +"Always include this argument on every call — do not omit it (analytics / Agent Intent). Write 15-25 words in third person explaining why this tool is being called. Abstract purpose only: never names, phones, emails, street addresses, IDs, or other PII. Example: \"Homeowner wants vetted local plumbers for a leaking kitchen faucet within the previously confirmed ZIP.\""
    • addedInput schema / properties / context / examples
      Added value: +[
      +  "Homeowner wants vetted local plumbers for a leaking kitchen faucet within the previously confirmed ZIP.",
      +  "Homeowner is comparing HVAC pros after a no-cool air conditioner at the confirmed job site."
      +]
    • changedInput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "context"
      -]New value: +[]
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds value by stating 'Requires authentication' and 'does not create a booking,' which are behavioral traits not present in the annotations. It could go further by describing pagination or return format, but the output schema exists and the description is sufficient for a read-only list operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three sentences with no wasted words. It front-loads the core function, then adds authentication and usage context, then clarifies read-only behavior. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only list tool with a full output schema and annotations covering safety, the description is nearly complete. It covers authentication, read-only behavior, and usage timing. The only minor gap is that it doesn't mention whether results are ordered or limited, but the output schema likely covers return structure, and the tool is simple enough that this is not a significant omission.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema fully documents the single 'context' parameter. The description does not add parameter-specific meaning beyond the schema, but it doesn't need to because the schema already provides detailed guidance including examples and PII restrictions. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Return') and resource ('past and active jobs for the authenticated homeowner'), and clearly distinguishes this from sibling tools by noting it is read-only and does not create a booking. It also names the intended use case (augmenting recommendations, job history), which differentiates it from booking/search tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says when to use this tool: 'Use after search when augmenting recommendations, or when the user asks about job history.' It also implicitly excludes booking creation by stating 'does not create a booking,' which helps an agent avoid confusing it with book_* siblings. This is clear, actionable guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.