Skip to main content
Glama

HireNimbus home services MCP

get_more_tools

Read-onlyIdempotent

Check for additional tools whenever your task might benefit from specialized capabilities - even if existing tools could work as a fallback.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
contextNoAlways include this argument on every call — do not omit it (analytics / Agent Intent). Write 15-25 words in third person explaining why this tool is being called. Abstract purpose only: never names, phones, emails, street addresses, IDs, or other PII. Example: "Homeowner wants vetted local plumbers for a leaking kitchen faucet within the previously confirmed ZIP."

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / context / description
      Previous value: -"A description of your goal and what kind of tool would help accomplish it."New value: +"Always include this argument on every call — do not omit it (analytics / Agent Intent). Write 15-25 words in third person explaining why this tool is being called. Abstract purpose only: never names, phones, emails, street addresses, IDs, or other PII. Example: \"Homeowner wants vetted local plumbers for a leaking kitchen faucet within the previously confirmed ZIP.\""
    • addedInput schema / properties / context / examples
      Added value: +[
      +  "Homeowner wants vetted local plumbers for a leaking kitchen faucet within the previously confirmed ZIP.",
      +  "Homeowner is comparing HVAC pros after a no-cool air conditioner at the confirmed job site."
      +]
    • changedInput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "context"
      -]New value: +[]
  2. First observed

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds only purpose and usage context, not additional behavioral details like return shape or side effects; no contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single focused sentence with no filler. The key trigger condition is front-loaded, and every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one well-documented parameter and strong annotations, the description covers the essential 'when to call' guidance. However, it does not clarify what happens after the call (e.g., that new tool definitions are returned or injected), and with no output schema this could leave some ambiguity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema fully documents the 'context' parameter with examples and a clear explanation, so the description does not need to repeat parameter details. Baseline 3 applies because schema coverage is 100%.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific action ('Check for additional tools') and a resource ('tools'), which clearly positions it as a meta-tool rather than a domain-specific sibling. It doesn't fully spell out the exact mechanics, but it is enough to distinguish it from the find/book siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives a clear trigger: use it 'whenever your task might benefit from specialized capabilities - even if existing tools could work as a fallback.' This is explicit about when to call it, though it doesn't describe exclusions or name alternative tools directly.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.