Skip to main content
Glama

HelloBooks AI Agents MCP Server

list_videos

List HelloBooks product videos curated on the marketing site (homepage demo + feature walkthroughs) and the official @hellobooksai YouTube channel link. Each video returns title, description, category, watch URL, embed URL and thumbnail. Filter by category (demo / features / overview), featuredOnly, or free-text query. Use this when a user asks for a demo, walkthrough or video. Note: this is the curated set, not a live mirror of every channel upload — the response includes the channel URL for the full catalog.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
queryNoOptional substring match against video title + description.
categoryNoFilter to one video category (demo, features, overview).
featuredOnlyNoIf true, only return videos flagged as featured on the marketing site.

TDQS

A5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It discloses that the list is curated, not a live mirror, and includes the channel URL for full catalog. This transparency covers all behavioral aspects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three sentences, front-loaded with purpose, each sentence adding distinct value. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a list tool with 3 optional parameters and no output schema, the description covers input usage, output fields, and important context (curated set, channel URL). It is complete for agent decision-making.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, but the description adds context beyond schema: explains query as substring match, category with examples, and featuredOnly as boolean filter. This adds meaningful guidance.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'List HelloBooks product videos curated on the marketing site' and the resource (videos). It specifies output fields and distinguishes from a live mirror, making the purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says 'Use this when a user asks for a demo, walkthrough or video.' It also notes when NOT to use it (for full catalog, by directing to channel URL). This provides clear guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Tools are largely distinct, each targeting a specific report type (balance sheet, P&L, trial balance) or functionality. Some overlap exists between QBO and Xero variants, but descriptions clearly differentiate them. Overall, an agent can reliably select the right tool.

Naming Consistency4/5

Most tools follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (e.g., analyze_balance_sheet, list_articles). A few exceptions like free_tier_eligibility and how_munimji_helps break the pattern but are still readable and predictable.

Tool Count3/5

With 29 tools, the count is on the higher side but justified by the domain's breadth (financial analysis, compliance, migration, pricing, etc.). Some reduction through parameterization (e.g., merging QBO/Xero variants) would improve scope.

Completeness4/5

The tool surface covers key areas: financial statement analysis, compliance, migration estimation, feature/pricing info, and partner programs. Missing are direct data manipulation tools (e.g., create/edit journal entries), which may be intentional for a read-only analysis agent.