Skip to main content
Glama

jobctl

by io.github.DmytroRybka

Planned schedule

get_planned
Read-only

What is actually SCHEDULED: interviews with their time, attendees and meeting links, plus the actions falling due, for today, tomorrow, or the next seven days. Use this whenever the user asks what is planned, what the day or week looks like, or before proposing a time to anyone — get_due only knows action deadlines and is blind to booked interviews. Example: get_planned({range: "tomorrow"}).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
rangeNotoday (default), tomorrow, or week (today plus the next 6 days)

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=true, so safety is clear. The description adds behavioral details about what data is returned (interviews with attendees, links, actions). It does not mention error handling or edge cases, but for a simple read tool this is sufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences plus an example, front-loading key information without any wasted words. Every part contributes to understanding the tool's use and behavior.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Although there is no output schema, the description lists the components of the return (time, attendees, links, actions). Combined with the read-only annotation and clear distinction from get_due, the description is fairly complete for a simple tool with one optional parameter.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with a clear enum description for range. The description provides an example call but does not add significant new meaning beyond the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate as schema carries the parameter semantics well.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it returns scheduled interviews with time, attendees, meeting links, and actions falling due for a specified range. It distinguishes itself from the sibling tool get_due, making the purpose specific and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly advises when to use this tool: when users ask about plans, day/week overview, or before proposing a time. It also contrasts with get_due, noting that get_due only knows action deadlines, providing clear guidance on tool selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All jobctl toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Every tool targets a distinct resource and action: application, note, analysis attachment, file attachment, interview file, application detail, due actions, planned schedule, application listing, interview logging, and application updates. Even the three 'attach' tools are clearly differentiated by purpose (analysis vs CV/cover letter vs interview prep). The only potential overlap between get_due and get_planned is explicitly resolved in the descriptions.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (add_application, get_application, list_applications, update_application, attach_analysis, log_interview, etc.). The verb prefix accurately reflects the action, and nouns are singular for single-item operations and plural for list operations, maintaining a predictable convention.

Tool Count5/5

With 11 tools, the server is well-scoped for a job application tracking domain. Each tool covers a necessary function without redundancy, and the count is neither sparse nor overwhelming.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers the full lifecycle of an application: create, read, list, update, plus notes, attachments, analysis, and interview logging. Minor gaps exist—there is no explicit delete or archive tool (though status updates can archive), and interviews cannot be directly updated or removed after logging—but these are workable within the existing surface.

Resources