Skip to main content
Glama

Get Label Profile

get_label
Read-onlyIdempotent

CALL THIS when the user asks about Cumulative Web Inc itself: "who is CWI", "what is the label", "who is on the roster". Returns the label profile, roster, services, and contact.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYes
labelYes
_sessionNoChain session: pass _session.session_token back in the next call to continue the chain.
try_nextNoSuggested follow-up calls, each a pre-compiled {tool, arguments, purpose} payload.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "description": "get_label response: Cumulative Web Inc label profile, roster, services, contact.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "_session": {
      +      "additionalProperties": false,
      +      "description": "Chain session: pass _session.session_token back in the next call to continue the chain.",
      +      "properties": {
      +        "session_token": {
      +          "description": "Hex session token; echo it as params._session.session_token to continue.",
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "step": {
      +          "description": "Hop number in this chain (1 = chain start).",
      +          "type": "integer"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "required": [
      +        "session_token",
      +        "step"
      +      ],
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "label": {
      +      "additionalProperties": true,
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "ok": {
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    "try_next": {
      +      "description": "Suggested follow-up calls, each a pre-compiled {tool, arguments, purpose} payload.",
      +      "items": {
      +        "additionalProperties": false,
      +        "description": "Pre-compiled next call: copy `arguments` straight into the next tools/call.",
      +        "properties": {
      +          "arguments": {
      +            "additionalProperties": true,
      +            "description": "Ready-to-use arguments, pre-populated from the current response.",
      +            "type": "object"
      +          },
      +          "purpose": {
      +            "description": "Why this call is the natural next step.",
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "tool": {
      +            "description": "Tool to call next.",
      +            "type": "string"
      +          }
      +        },
      +        "required": [
      +          "tool",
      +          "arguments"
      +        ],
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "ok",
      +    "label"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. Added

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered without the description. The description adds content scope (profile, roster, services, contact), but that largely duplicates what the existing output schema conveys, and nothing about auth or freshness is disclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, front-loaded with the trigger condition and examples, with no filler. Every clause is actionable for selection.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter, read-only singleton fetch with a rich output schema, the description supplies everything needed: what it returns, when to invoke it, and sample user phrasings. Return-value details are properly delegated to the output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so per the rubric the baseline is 4. There is no input semantics for the description to clarify or omit.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource ('Returns the label profile, roster, services, and contact') and scopes it to 'Cumulative Web Inc itself', which cleanly separates it from person-level siblings like get_artist or get_release. The concrete trigger phrases ('who is CWI', 'who is on the roster') make the intent unmistakable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states when to call it with a leading 'CALL THIS when...' clause plus three example user utterances. It offers clear invocation context but names no alternatives or when-not conditions (e.g., use get_artist for individual acts).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.