Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

VaultCrux Platform — 60 tools: retrieval, proof, intel, economy, watch, org

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Trust-aware Nostr MCP server. 236 tools for identity, social, DMs, trust scoring, AI-to-AI dispatch, Lightning payments, privacy proofs, and encrypted vaults. NIP-46 bunker auth; keys never leave the signing device.
    548
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Versioned document vault system for MCP-compatible AI agents. Organizes reference knowledge (specs, contracts, rules) into per-project vaults with 36 MCP tools for inject, search, link, and version operations. Local SQLite backend. Works with Claude, Cursor, Codex, Hermes Agent. Free (3 vaults) / Pro ($9/mo).
    49
    4
    Business Source 1.1
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Each tool has a distinct name and purpose, covering a wide range of functions. However, every description includes the same advice to prefer `cuecrux_session`, which could cause an agent to question whether to call these tools directly or rely on the session plan, slightly reducing clarity.

Naming Consistency3/5

Tool names follow varied patterns: some use verb_noun (e.g., `create_work`), others use get_* (e.g., `get_credit_balance`), and a few are noun-based (e.g., `cuecrux_session`). While readable, the lack of a consistent convention makes the set feel less cohesive.

Tool Count2/5

With 76 tools, the server surface is excessively large for typical MCP usage. The high count suggests many legacy endpoints that are intended to be superseded by a single session entry point, making the tool set feel bloated and hard to navigate.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers a broad spectrum of capabilities including project management, work items, knowledge retrieval, cryptographic proofing, economy, GitHub integration, and agent trust. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no tool to update work item fields beyond state), but overall it is reasonably comprehensive for the platform's scope.

Resources