Skip to main content
Glama

CoinRithm Agent Trading

Prediction-market quote

pm_quote
Read-only

Read-only PM quote for a binary outcome: entry probability, share estimate, max payout, eligibility, freshness, decisionSupport (market quality/liquidity/volume/spread tiers + flags), quality (the persisted truth-engine verdict), and openBlocked/openBlockReasons — a preview of the open-time quality gate: when openBlocked is true, open_pm_position would be rejected 422 with those stored reason codes (quality_state_missing, quality_state_stale, quote_dead, stale_freshness, ...). Never mutates state. stakeMusd must be > 0 (min to open is 10). Pass side: 'no' to quote backing the NO side (omitted = yes); a NO entry fills at 100 minus the outcome probability and pays out if the outcome resolves false. Paper trading only — virtual funds (50,000 mUSD). Not financial advice. Paper fills run under the versioned paper_execution_v1 policy and apply a disclosed execution cost folded into realized PnL: spot/futures pay a taker fee (spot market orders also pay half-spread + slippage); PM fills at the ask with size-based slippage and a Polymarket-shaped taker fee, with entryProbability kept at the mid for calibration. See the executionModel in quote/trade results — a rehearsal cost, not an exchange fill guarantee.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
sideNoWhich side of the binary outcome to back. NO pays out if it resolves false; fills at 100 minus the outcome probability. Omitted = yes.
slugYesEvent slug.
sourceYesSource slug (e.g. kalshi, polymarket).
stakeMusdYesmUSD to stake (> 0).
agentTraceNoOptional private trace metadata stored in the caller's ledger.
outcomeExternalMarketIdYesCase-sensitive outcome / market id.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYesTrue when CoinRithm returned a successful 2xx response.
bodyNoParsed CoinRithm response body, or raw text when the response is not JSON.
httpStatusYesHTTP status returned by CoinRithm, or 0 for network errors.
ledgerStatusNoLedger write status header returned by CoinRithm, when present.
ledgerEventIdNoPrivate AgentActionEvent id returned by /api/agent/*, when present.

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare readOnlyHint true and destructiveHint false; description adds detail on paper trading, simulated execution costs, and that no state is mutated. This provides useful clarity beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description front-loads purpose but is lengthy and includes some extraneous detail on paper execution policy. Still well-structured and informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given output schema exists, description covers all necessary aspects: read-only, parameters, paper trading, behavioral notes on openBlocked, and execution cost model. An agent can correctly invoke the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, but description adds meaning: stakeMusd must be >0 and min 10, side details, outcomeExternalMarketId case-sensitive. AgentTrace description duplicates schema but offers context.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it is a read-only quote for binary outcomes, listing key return fields. It distinguishes from sibling quote tools like spot_quote and futures_quote by specifying prediction market context and read-only nature.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides guidance on side parameter (no side for NO, omitted for YES), stakeMusd minimum (10), and explains openBlocked as a preview of rejection. Lacks explicit when-not-to-use or alternatives, but context implies use before opening a position.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct resource or action (e.g., spot vs futures vs PM, quote vs open vs close, different PM data endpoints). Descriptions provide clear context and usage guidance, eliminating ambiguity.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., `cancel_spot_order`, `open_futures_position`, `pm_data_event`). Even `whoami` is a common exception. Naming is uniform and predictable.

Tool Count4/5

35 tools is on the high side but appropriate for a multi-venue trading platform covering spot, futures, prediction markets, analytics, and account management. Each tool serves a distinct purpose, though minor consolidation could be possible.

Completeness5/5

The tool surface covers the full trading lifecycle: quotes, order placement, cancellation, position management, SL/TP, portfolio tracking, performance, and extensive market data. No obvious gaps for the stated purpose.