Skip to main content
Glama

CoinRithm Agent Trading

Open futures position

open_futures_position
Idempotent

Open (or add to) a mock futures position. Requires the trade:futures scope. Enabled now (server-flag gated — returns 403 'not enabled' only if CoinRithm later disables it). idempotencyKey is REQUIRED and must be unique per intent. leverage 1-20, marginMusd >= 10. Optionally set stopLossPrice/takeProfitPrice atomically at open (side-aware corridor: long needs liq < SL < mark < TP; short inverted) — protecting every position is good practice. Quote first and CONFIRM with the user. Paper trading only — virtual funds (50,000 mUSD). Not financial advice. Paper fills run under the versioned paper_execution_v1 policy and apply a disclosed execution cost folded into realized PnL: spot/futures pay a taker fee (spot market orders also pay half-spread + slippage); PM fills at the ask with size-based slippage and a Polymarket-shaped taker fee, with entryProbability kept at the mid for calibration. See the executionModel in quote/trade results — a rehearsal cost, not an exchange fill guarantee.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
sideYesFutures direction: long benefits if price rises; short benefits if price falls.
coinIdYesCoin UCID to open futures for. Use resolve_symbol first.
leverageYesLeverage multiplier (1-20x).
agentTraceNoOptional private trace metadata stored in the caller's ledger.
marginMusdYesIsolated margin in mUSD (>= 10).
stopLossPriceNoOptional resting stop-loss set atomically at open (USD trigger; fired by the per-minute worker).
idempotencyKeyYesUnique per intent; reuse replays the original result.
takeProfitPriceNoOptional resting take-profit set atomically at open (USD trigger; fired by the per-minute worker).

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYesTrue when CoinRithm returned a successful 2xx response.
bodyNoParsed CoinRithm response body, or raw text when the response is not JSON.
httpStatusYesHTTP status returned by CoinRithm, or 0 for network errors.
ledgerStatusNoLedger write status header returned by CoinRithm, when present.
ledgerEventIdNoPrivate AgentActionEvent id returned by /api/agent/*, when present.

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Extensive disclosure beyond annotations: scope, server-flag gating, idempotency, leverage/margin constraints, side-aware SL/TP corridors, paper trading nature, virtual funds, execution costs, and contract model. No contradictions with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is lengthier than average but every sentence adds value and critical details. Structure is logical: action, scope, constraints, best practices, execution model. Slightly verbose but not wasteful.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (8 params, output schema present, paper trading simulation), the description fully covers purpose, constraints, execution model, and agent guidance. No gaps for agent invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers all parameters (100% coverage), but description adds valuable context like the side-aware corridor logic for stopLossPrice/takeProfitPrice and the requirement for idempotencyKey uniqueness.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it opens or adds to a mock futures position, specifying the verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like close_futures_position and futures_quote.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides clear context: when to use (open futures), requirement to quote and confirm, and idempotency key usage. While it doesn't list alternative tools, it gives actionable guidance for correct invocation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct resource or action (e.g., spot vs futures vs PM, quote vs open vs close, different PM data endpoints). Descriptions provide clear context and usage guidance, eliminating ambiguity.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., `cancel_spot_order`, `open_futures_position`, `pm_data_event`). Even `whoami` is a common exception. Naming is uniform and predictable.

Tool Count4/5

35 tools is on the high side but appropriate for a multi-venue trading platform covering spot, futures, prediction markets, analytics, and account management. Each tool serves a distinct purpose, though minor consolidation could be possible.

Completeness5/5

The tool surface covers the full trading lifecycle: quotes, order placement, cancellation, position management, SL/TP, portfolio tracking, performance, and extensive market data. No obvious gaps for the stated purpose.