Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given a nested node object with a 10-value type enum, an arbitrary config object, and an existing output schema, the description covers insertion semantics and offloads type-specific config to clipform_create_form plus guide references. It does not mention failure modes (e.g., invalid after_node_id, node limits), which keeps it just short of complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.