Skip to main content
Glama

Realtap

Pre-flight check of a programmable token transfer

check_programmable_transfer
Read-onlyIdempotent

Would a transfer of a programmable token (CIP-113) from A to B be allowed, and if not, why? Answers only from state we index (the sender's balance under the standard's contract, a pause or shutdown, the block list of either side) and lists what it can NOT know: identity checks signed off chain, the issuer's own transfer script, a rule change before the transaction is built. The best verdict is nothing_visible_forbids, never "allowed". A token whose rules are scripts we cannot read answers rules_unreadable. Nothing is built or signed.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
toNoReceiver: addr1… address (ordinary or smart-wallet), stake1… address or a 56-hex owner credential.
fromNoSender: addr1… address (ordinary or smart-wallet), stake1… address or a 56-hex owner credential.
unitYesToken unit: policy id + asset name in hex.
amountNoAmount to send, decimal-adjusted, as plain digits (for example "10" or "2.5").

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

Score is being calculated.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources