Skip to main content
Glama

facebook_page_details

Facebook page profile — likes vs followers (distinct), talkingAbout, category, website, and public email. Costs 2 credits. Empty results and failures are never charged. Pass cache=true for a free 24h cache hit (default always fresh).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
urlYesFacebook page URL, @handle, or page name, e.g. https://facebook.com/PageName. The URL platform must match this endpoint's platform. Do not pass cross-platform URLs, e.g. YouTube to TikTok, Instagram to Facebook, LinkedIn to X/Twitter, or Pinterest to Rumble.
cacheNoSet true to serve from the 24h response cache (0 credits on hit). Default false — always fetch fresh.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / cache / description
      Previous value: -"Set true to serve from the 24h response cache (0 credits on hit). Default false — always fetch fresh. Envelope includes cached + cachedAt on hits."New value: +"Set true to serve from the 24h response cache (0 credits on hit). Default false — always fetch fresh."
  2. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / cache / description
      Previous value: -"Set true to serve from the 24h response cache. Default false — always fetch fresh data."New value: +"Set true to serve from the 24h response cache (0 credits on hit). Default false — always fetch fresh. Envelope includes cached + cachedAt on hits."
    • changedInput schema / properties / url / description
      Previous value: -"Facebook page URL, e.g. https://facebook.com/PageName. The URL platform must match this tool's platform. Do not pass cross-platform URLs, e.g. YouTube to TikTok, Instagram to Facebook, LinkedIn to X/Twitter, or Pinterest to Rumble."New value: +"Facebook page URL, @handle, or page name, e.g. https://facebook.com/PageName. The URL platform must match this endpoint's platform. Do not pass cross-platform URLs, e.g. YouTube to TikTok, Instagram to Facebook, LinkedIn to X/Twitter, or Pinterest to Rumble."
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / cache / description
      Previous value: -"Responses are cached for 24 hours by default. Set false to bypass the cache and always fetch fresh data (default true)."New value: +"Set true to serve from the 24h response cache. Default false — always fetch fresh data."
  4. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / cache
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Responses are cached for 24 hours by default. Set false to bypass the cache and always fetch fresh data (default true).",
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
  5. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / url / description
      Previous value: -"Facebook page URL, e.g. https://facebook.com/PageName."New value: +"Facebook page URL, e.g. https://facebook.com/PageName. The URL platform must match this tool's platform. Do not pass cross-platform URLs, e.g. YouTube to TikTok, Instagram to Facebook, LinkedIn to X/Twitter, or Pinterest to Rumble."
  6. First observed

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of disclosing behavior. It usefully discloses the 2-credit cost, that empty results and failures are never charged, and the cache behavior with cache=true. This goes beyond surface-level purpose and gives an agent actionable operational expectations, though it does not discuss rate limits or error response specifics.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a compact two-sentence structure: the first sentence conveys purpose and key output fields, and the second covers cost and caching. There is no filler or redundant elaboration; every clause contributes useful information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple, has only two well-documented parameters, and no output schema, so the description's listing of returned fields partially compensates. It also covers costing and cache behavior, which are important operational details. It could be more complete by clarifying the shape of the response or handling of missing pages, but overall it is sufficient for the tool's complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents both url and cache parameters well. The description restates the cache behavior already present in the schema, adding no meaningful new parameter semantics. Baseline 3 is appropriate when the schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the resource as a Facebook page profile and lists specific returned data like likes vs followers, talkingAbout, category, website, and public email. However, it lacks an explicit verb like 'retrieves' or 'returns', and it does not explicitly differentiate itself from the similar sibling facebook_details.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as facebook_details or facebook_summarize. It mentions cache usage and credit cost, but offers no selection criteria or exclusions to help route an agent to the correct endpoint.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.