Skip to main content
Glama

Red by Big Red Cloud

by io.github.BigRedCloud
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

Delete Product

brc_delete_product
Destructive

Deletes a BRC product by id. Requires a valid routeToken issued for the matching action workflow. The token remains valid through lookup, preview and the permitted transaction. Placeholder tokens are invalid. A routeToken does not bypass preview or explicit-confirmation requirements. A call without confirmWrite: true returns confirmation_required and a payload preview. confirmWrite: true applies the previewed change after explicit confirmation. Passing preflight is not confirmation.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesproduct id.
routeTokenYesOpaque routeToken from brc_route_request for this action workflow. Required for transactional tools. Routing permission only — does not replace preview-before-posting or confirmWrite.
companyNameYesCompany context name, for example YOUR-COMPANY-NAME.
confirmWriteNoMust be true only after a plain-English preview before posting has been shown in the current conversation and the user explicitly confirmed posting (for example yes, create it / post it now / confirm). Never set true on the first call or because the user initially asked to create something. Nothing is written to Big Red Cloud until you confirm.
confirmDeleteNo
connectionRefNoOpaque Red connection reference returned by brc_confirm_company_connection. Pass this exact value on every later tool call when the MCP client rotates session ids (for example Vibe/Mistral). Keep reusing the same connectionRef after successful tool calls — do not start a new connection because a lookup returned empty or partial data. It is not an API key and does not contain credentials.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / routeToken
      Added value: +{
+  "description": "Opaque routeToken from brc_route_request for this action workflow. Required for transactional tools. Routing permission only — does not replace preview-before-posting or confirmWrite.",
+  "minLength": 1,
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • changedInput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
-  "companyName",
-  "id"
-]New value: +[
+  "companyName",
+  "id",
+  "routeToken"
+]
  2. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / properties / routeToken
      Removed value: -{
-  "description": "Opaque routeToken from brc_route_request for this action workflow. Required for transactional tools. Routing permission only — does not replace preview-before-posting or confirmWrite.",
-  "minLength": 1,
-  "type": "string"
-}
    • changedInput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
-  "companyName",
-  "id",
-  "routeToken"
-]New value: +[
+  "companyName",
+  "id"
+]
  3. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / routeToken
      Added value: +{
+  "description": "Opaque routeToken from brc_route_request for this action workflow. Required for transactional tools. Routing permission only — does not replace preview-before-posting or confirmWrite.",
+  "minLength": 1,
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • changedInput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
-  "companyName",
-  "id"
-]New value: +[
+  "companyName",
+  "id",
+  "routeToken"
+]
  4. First observed

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Goes well beyond the destructiveHint=true/readOnlyHint=false annotations by disclosing the full transactional behavior: token validity window, placeholder token invalidity, that routeToken does not bypass preview/confirmation requirements, the confirmation_required return path, and that preflight is not confirmation. This is exactly the kind of behavioral context an agent needs to drive a destructive two-phase workflow safely.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Seven sentences, and each one earns its place — the purpose is front-loaded, followed by tightly packed token and confirmation workflow details with no filler. Slightly long, but the density of new behavioral information justifies the length for a destructive transactional tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive 6-parameter tool with no output schema, the description covers the essential ground: prerequisites, two-phase confirmation behavior, and the non-confirmed return case. Remaining gaps are minor — confirmDelete is never explained, and the post-delete outcome is not described — but the agent has enough to invoke the tool safely and correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 83%, so the baseline is 3, but the description adds real meaning to the two critical params: it explains routeToken's lifecycle ('remains valid through lookup, preview and the permitted transaction') and confirmWrite's exact behavior across calls. Minor gap: confirmDelete has no schema description and is never mentioned in the description, leaving its semantics undocumented everywhere.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Leads with the specific verb+resource: 'Deletes a BRC product by id.' This unambiguously identifies the action and target, and naturally distinguishes it from the many sibling delete tools (delete_customer, delete_supplier, etc.). Nothing about the purpose is left to inference.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides clear, explicit workflow context: a valid routeToken from the matching action workflow is a stated prerequisite, and the description spells out when to call without confirmWrite (returns confirmation_required + preview) versus with confirmWrite (applies the previewed change). It does not name alternatives or exclusions among siblings, but the operational context for correct invocation is unambiguous.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Red by Big Red Cloud toolsInspect
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources