Skip to main content
Glama

Arc & Ledger Tax Tools

Check IRS resolution options

check_resolution_options
Read-only

Use this when someone owes the IRS back taxes and asks how to settle, get on a payment plan, lower what they owe, or stop collection. Screens which IRS paths may fit - short-term payment plan, current Simple Payment Plan or an installment agreement with financial review, Offer in Compromise (a fit-check only, never a promise of acceptance), Currently Not Collectible hardship status, and penalty abatement - and lists the forms needed (9465, 433-F/A/B, 656, 843, 8821, 2848) plus collection-statute context. A coarse tax_account_type improves the screen without identifying the taxpayer. Never guarantees an IRS outcome. Set brief:true for a shorter answer.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
briefNoSet true for a shorter answer: options come back as path + fit only, without the descriptions.
ability_to_payYesYour realistic ability to pay. can_pay_in_full_soon = you can clear the balance within about 120-180 days; can_make_monthly_payments = a monthly amount but not in full; can_pay_little = only a very small monthly amount; cannot_pay_basic_living = paying the IRS would leave you unable to cover basic living expenses (financial hardship).
balance_owed_usdYesTotal amount owed to the IRS including tax, penalties, and interest (a rough figure is fine).
tax_account_typeNoCoarse, nonidentifying IRS account type. individual_income_tax includes Form 1040 income-tax balances, including a sole proprietor whose balance is on Form 1040. business_non_trust_fund_or_out_of_business covers non-trust-fund business tax or an out-of-business sole proprietor account. business_trust_fund covers in-business payroll or other trust-fund tax. Use unknown when unsure. Defaults to unknown.
all_required_returns_filedNoWhether every required tax return has actually been FILED (even if the tax was not paid). Filing compliance is generally required before the IRS formalizes a collection alternative, but the exact account requirements control. Defaults to false.
balance_includes_penaltiesNoWhether the balance includes failure-to-file or failure-to-pay penalties, so penalty abatement may reduce it. Defaults to true.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
relayYesInstruction to the calling assistant: relay figures and dates verbatim (identical on every response).
next_stepYesA single review link appropriate to this server surface.
disclaimerYesGeneral-information disclaimer (identical on every response).
source_urlYesThe arcandledger.com page that backs this answer.
server_versionNoServer release that produced this response (matches GET /version).

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare readOnlyHint=true, so no write behavior. The description adds that the tool is a screening mechanism (not a guarantee), lists forms needed, explains the coarse purpose of tax_account_type, and describes the brief parameter effect. No contradictions with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the primary usage scenario. Every sentence adds value: it lists resolution paths, forms, and important caveats (no guarantee, brief mode). Despite length, it remains focused and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (6 parameters, output schema exists), the description sufficiently covers when to use, what it screens, dependencies (filing compliance, ability to pay), and limitations. With an output schema, return values need not be detailed in the description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description does not add significant new meaning beyond the schema's parameter descriptions, though it provides overall context. It mentions the brief parameter and the coarse screening role of tax_account_type, but that is already in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: to screen IRS resolution paths when someone owes back taxes. It specifies the context ('someone owes the IRS back taxes and asks how to settle') and distinguishes it from sibling tools (e.g., check_5472_obligation) by focusing on payment plans, offers in compromise, etc., not other tax obligations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly states when to use the tool ('Use this when someone owes the IRS back taxes...') and includes conditions for different resolution paths. It also provides guidance on parameters like ability_to_pay and cautions that it never guarantees an IRS outcome, offering clear usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have distinct purposes (e.g., FBAR/FATCA, penalty estimation, consultation booking), though check_resolution_options and estimate_irs_penalty both deal with IRS debts but address different aspects (settlement paths vs. penalty calculation). Overall, boundaries are clear due to detailed descriptions.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., book_consultation, check_fbar_fatca, estimate_reasonable_comp). No mixing of styles or vague verbs.

Tool Count4/5

18 tools is slightly on the high side but justified for a comprehensive tax tool covering common scenarios (penalties, estimates, notices, formations). Each tool serves a specific need without redundancy.

Completeness4/5

The set covers major tax areas (foreign reporting, penalties, estimated taxes, entity formation, IRS notices). Minor gaps exist, such as state income tax and retirement contributions, but the core domain for small business owners and non-residents is well covered.