Previous value: -"OPTIONAL, and each pillar inside it is optional. The four AI BVF pillars, each an honest 0–100 self-assessment, combining deterministically into the verdict: governance_risk ≥ 70 OR financial_return ≤ 20 returns Stop; strategic_alignment, financial_return and change_enablement all ≥ 60 with governance_risk ≤ 40 returns Accelerate; everything else returns Fix. Pass ONLY the pillars the user has real evidence for — do NOT invent numbers for the rest. Missing pillars are estimated deterministically by the engine from disclosed AI BVF planning assumptions, the response reports which via pillar_basis and scores_used, decision confidence is haircut by how much was estimated, and a fully-estimated pass can never return Accelerate (it returns Fix pending confirmation). So call immediately with whatever the user gave you, then ask for evidence on the estimated pillars and re-call to firm the verdict up."New value: +"OPTIONAL, and each pillar inside it is optional. The four AI BVF pillars, each an honest 0–100 self-assessment, combining deterministically into the verdict: governance_risk ≥ 70 OR financial_return ≤ 20 returns Stop; strategic_alignment, financial_return and change_enablement all ≥ 60 with governance_risk ≤ 40 returns Accelerate; everything else returns Fix. Pass ONLY the pillars the user has real evidence for — do NOT invent numbers for the rest. Missing pillars are estimated deterministically by the engine from disclosed AI BVF planning assumptions, the response reports which via pillar_basis and scores_used, decision score is haircut by how much was estimated, and a fully-estimated pass can never return Accelerate (it returns Fix pending confirmation). So call immediately with whatever the user gave you, then ask for evidence on the estimated pillars and re-call to firm the verdict up."

Previous value: -"Optional 0–1. How grounded the four pillar scores are in real evidence versus estimated from context. Defaults to 1 (treated as measured). If the organisation lacks formal change-readiness or risk metadata, estimate the pillars from what you know AND set this lower to say so — decision confidence is reduced proportionally and a caveat is attached, instead of returning a falsely confident verdict on soft inputs."New value: +"Optional 0 to 1 input-quality factor. The default ranges from 0.5 when all pillars are estimated to 1 when all are supplied. Supplied values still require evidence review. Lower this factor when the supplied pillars rest on weak evidence."

Previous value: -"Optional evidence that the work around the AI has been redesigned. Pass only what is known. Any explicit false value blocks Accelerate until the gap is closed; omitted checks remain visible as unknown."New value: +"Evidence that workflows, roles, decision rights and measures are ready. Pass only what is known. Explicit gaps and omitted checks block Accelerate until all four checks are evidenced."

Previous value: -"BVF scoring modules that fired for this input."New value: +"Scoring-rule and sector-context labels. Sector labels do not certify clinical validation or regulatory compliance."

Previous value: -"Confidence in the verdict, 0-100."New value: +"Heuristic decision score, 0 to 100, adjusted for input quality. This score has no probability calibration."

Added value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": {
+    "type": "string"
+  },
+  "description": "Meaning and limits of compatibility fields. Present these labels when explaining the result.",
+  "type": "object"
+}

Previous value: -"Modelled net value in EUR after capture rate, low/high."New value: +"Readiness-adjusted benefit hypothesis before project build, run and change costs. Replace planning rates with scoped economics before funding."

Previous value: -"object"New value: +[
+  "object",
+  "null"
+]

Previous value: -"The work architecture gate across workflow, roles, human decision rights and performance measures. Any stated gap blocks Accelerate."New value: +"The work architecture gate across workflow, roles, human decision rights and performance measures. A stated gap or missing evidence blocks Accelerate."

Added value: +{
+  "items": {
+    "type": "string"
+  },
+  "type": "array"
+}

Previous value: -[
-  "status",
-  "blocks_accelerate",
-  "checks",
-  "gaps",
-  "gate"
-]New value: +[
+  "status",
+  "blocks_accelerate",
+  "checks",
+  "gaps",
+  "unknowns",
+  "gate"
+]

Previous value: -"Approximate annual revenue in EUR (must be ≥ 0). Scales the whole output: the benchmark rates are applied as fractions of this figure, so the modelled EUR value range grows with it. A rough order-of-magnitude estimate is fine."New value: +"Approximate annual revenue in EUR (must be ≥ 0). Scales the whole output: the disclosed AI BVF planning rates are applied as fractions of this figure, so the modelled EUR value range grows with it. A rough order-of-magnitude estimate is fine."

Previous value: -"OPTIONAL, and each pillar inside it is optional. The four AI BVF pillars, each an honest 0–100 self-assessment, combining deterministically into the verdict: governance_risk ≥ 70 OR financial_return ≤ 20 returns Stop; strategic_alignment, financial_return and change_enablement all ≥ 60 with governance_risk ≤ 40 returns Accelerate; everything else returns Fix. Pass ONLY the pillars the user has real evidence for — do NOT invent numbers for the rest. Missing pillars are estimated deterministically by the engine (from readiness, tier, function and published benchmarks), the response reports which via pillar_basis and scores_used, decision confidence is haircut by how much was estimated, and a fully-estimated pass can never return Accelerate (it returns Fix pending confirmation). So call immediately with whatever the user gave you, then ask for evidence on the estimated pillars and re-call to firm the verdict up."New value: +"OPTIONAL, and each pillar inside it is optional. The four AI BVF pillars, each an honest 0–100 self-assessment, combining deterministically into the verdict: governance_risk ≥ 70 OR financial_return ≤ 20 returns Stop; strategic_alignment, financial_return and change_enablement all ≥ 60 with governance_risk ≤ 40 returns Accelerate; everything else returns Fix. Pass ONLY the pillars the user has real evidence for — do NOT invent numbers for the rest. Missing pillars are estimated deterministically by the engine from disclosed AI BVF planning assumptions, the response reports which via pillar_basis and scores_used, decision confidence is haircut by how much was estimated, and a fully-estimated pass can never return Accelerate (it returns Fix pending confirmation). So call immediately with whatever the user gave you, then ask for evidence on the estimated pillars and re-call to firm the verdict up."

Previous value: -"Optional; when omitted, estimated from the published benchmark upside for the function (40–52, never enough to clear 60 unmodelled, never low enough to force a Stop). Strength of the modelled return (0–100, higher is better). A value ≤ 20 forces a Stop on its own; ≥ 60 is one of the four conditions required for Accelerate."New value: +"Optional; when omitted, estimated from the disclosed AI BVF planning range for the function (40–52, never enough to clear 60 unmodelled, never low enough to force a Stop). Strength of the modelled return (0–100, higher is better). A value ≤ 20 forces a Stop on its own; ≥ 60 is one of the four conditions required for Accelerate."

Previous value: -"Citation for the benchmark rates applied."New value: +"Provenance and evidence status for the AI BVF planning rates applied."

Previous value: -"Optional three-question feedback route, present only for Fix/Stop verdicts. The link opens a prefilled email; no assessment data is added and no response is recorded unless the user chooses to send it."New value: +"Optional three-question feedback route, present only for Fix/Stop verdicts. The page records the response anonymously only when the user chooses an answer; no assessment data is attached."

Previous value: -"Optional one-question feedback route, present only for Fix/Stop verdicts. The link opens a prefilled email; no response is recorded unless the user chooses to send it."New value: +"Optional three-question feedback route, present only for Fix/Stop verdicts. The link opens a prefilled email; no assessment data is added and no response is recorded unless the user chooses to send it."

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Optional evidence that the work around the AI has been redesigned. Pass only what is known. Any explicit false value blocks Accelerate until the gap is closed; omitted checks remain visible as unknown.",
+  "properties": {
+    "decision_rights_defined": {
+      "description": "True only when decision, override and escalation rights have named human owners, false when authority remains unclear.",
+      "type": "boolean"
+    },
+    "measures_updated": {
+      "description": "True only when performance measures and incentives reflect the redesigned work, false when the old measures remain.",
+      "type": "boolean"
+    },
+    "roles_redesigned": {
+      "description": "True only when affected roles, accountabilities and capability expectations have been rewritten, false when roles remain unchanged.",
+      "type": "boolean"
+    },
+    "workflow_redesigned": {
+      "description": "True only when the end-to-end workflow has been redesigned around the AI and retained human judgement, false when the existing workflow remains.",
+      "type": "boolean"
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}

Added value: +{
+  "description": "The work architecture gate across workflow, roles, human decision rights and performance measures. Any stated gap blocks Accelerate.",
+  "properties": {
+    "blocks_accelerate": {
+      "type": "boolean"
+    },
+    "checks": {
+      "items": {
+        "type": "object"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "gaps": {
+      "items": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    },
+    "gate": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "next_question": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "status": {
+      "enum": [
+        "unknown",
+        "partial",
+        "gap",
+        "ready"
+      ],
+      "type": "string"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "status",
+    "blocks_accelerate",
+    "checks",
+    "gaps",
+    "gate"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}

Previous value: -[
-  "bvf_version",
-  "classification",
-  "reason",
-  "net_value_eur",
-  "gross_value_eur",
-  "decision_confidence",
-  "multipliers",
-  "drivers",
-  "benchmark_source",
-  "applied_modules"
-]New value: +[
+  "bvf_version",
+  "classification",
+  "reason",
+  "net_value_eur",
+  "gross_value_eur",
+  "decision_confidence",
+  "multipliers",
+  "drivers",
+  "benchmark_source",
+  "applied_modules",
+  "work_architecture"
+]

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Optional one-question feedback route, present only for Fix/Stop verdicts. The link opens a prefilled email; no response is recorded unless the user chooses to send it.",
+  "properties": {
+    "question": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "url": {
+      "format": "uri",
+      "type": "string"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "question",
+    "url"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Reproducibility record: engine version, the rules that fired, and the resolved inputs. Deterministic, no timestamps. If the verdict is challenged months later, the same inputs on the same engine version reproduce it exactly.",
+  "properties": {
+    "bvf_version": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "engine": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "engine_version": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "inputs_used": {
+      "description": "The resolved inputs the result was computed on, including estimated pillar values.",
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "note": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "rules_fired": {
+      "description": "The rules that actually fired, in order: estimation, gates, classification, value arithmetic.",
+      "items": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}

Added value: +{
+  "description": "What moves this verdict, computed deterministically: the value if readiness were one notch worse, the value at revenue minus 20 percent, and the nearest single-pillar movements that flip the classification. Boards trust ranges with visible assumptions over point estimates; show this.",
+  "properties": {
+    "readiness_one_notch_down": {
+      "description": "Null when readiness is already siloed.",
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "revenue_minus_20pct": {
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "verdict_flips": {
+      "items": {
+        "type": "string"
+      },
+      "type": "array"
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}