Aziel Runtime

How to use this software

runtime_skill

Read-onlyIdempotent

Read the agent how-to (one door — discover, route, refuse; pipeline fraggate_list → fraggate_describe → fraggate_call). This is playbook markdown, not a catalog and not a machine manifest. Use this when starting a session or choosing the door before any catalog call. Do not use it for listing hashed registry names, hub Software-tab cards, or executing an engine; use fraggate_list, Softwares, or fraggate_call instead. Dual surface: agent chat has no technical UI chrome; Worker / Flutter / local install stay complete human software. Does not list slugs or run ops. Returns skill markdown plus display.title / display.summary.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
No arguments

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`code`	No	FragGate or fabric code when present: FG-OK, FG-HALLUC-TOOL, FG-STUB, FG-LOCAL-ONLY, FG-UNKNOWN-OP, FG-GATE-REFUSE, FG-LAMB-REFUSE, or a module refuse such as MESH-* / AKM-*.
`door`	No	Door name. The public door is fraggate.
`ran_in`	No	Execution locale (for example aziel-runtime) when present.
`result`	No	Machine payload. FragGate-style results commonly include ok, code, slug, op, status, engine_slug, engine_op, engine_digest, ran_in, provenance, refusal, limitations, and ledger_tip.
`status`	No	HTTP-like status when present on wrappers (200 ok; 400+ error / refuse).
`display`	No	Human-facing envelope. Show display.action, title, and summary, then take the next input. Never echo raw tool names.
`receipt`	No	Optional receipt, ledger tip, or TemporalLock/ForgeReceipts exit when the door stamped one.
`refusal`	No	Explicit refuse object, code, or message when the door or engine refused.
`engine_op`	No	Resolved engine op when present (often inside result).
`ledger_tip`	No	Ask/refuse ledger tip when the door stamped one.
`provenance`	No	Provenance / input packet when the pipeline attached one.
`session_id`	No	Raw session id when session plumbing was used. Hidden unless the user asked for the chain.
`engine_slug`	No	Resolved engine slug when present (often inside result).
`limitations`	No	Capability limitations or Remain-OFF notes when present.
`engine_digest`	No	64-hex engine_digest when a true in-process engine ran (often inside result).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed5 schema fields changedSep 27, 2026

changedOutput schema / description

Previous value: -"Display envelope shown to the user (display.title / display.summary) plus the machine result. Extra engine fields may appear."New value: +"Display envelope shown to the user (display.action / display.title / display.summary) plus the machine result. Extra engine fields may appear. Do not echo raw tool names."

changedOutput schema / properties / display / description

Previous value: -"Human-facing envelope. Show title and summary, then take the next input."New value: +"Human-facing envelope. Show display.action, title, and summary, then take the next input. Never echo raw tool names."

addedOutput schema / properties / display / properties / action

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Human-visible run frame. Always \"Run aziel runtime\". Product verb titles stay on title. Not a tool name.",
+  "type": "string"
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / display / properties / image

Added value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": true,
+  "description": "Present only when a real production included png_b64, jpeg_b64 (or the same byte family), or a cited http(s) image URL. No invented thumbs. Omitted on dry_run. reviewed is true only when executed production bytes are attached; a dry_run never mints reviewed.",
+  "properties": {
+    "data": {
+      "description": "Base64 image bytes copied from the production. Omitted for a URL-only cite. Never present on dry_run.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "mimeType": {
+      "description": "Sniffed image media type (image/png, image/jpeg, image/webp, or image/gif).",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "reviewed": {
+      "description": "True only when data came from an executed production. False for a URL cite without bytes. Never true on dry_run.",
+      "type": "boolean"
+    },
+    "source": {
+      "description": "Production field the image was taken from (for example png_b64, jpeg_b64, or image_url).",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "url": {
+      "description": "Cited http(s) image URL when the production named one. Not invented.",
+      "type": "string"
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}

changedOutput schema / properties / display / properties / title / description

Previous value: -"Short result title for the AI client."New value: +"Product verb title for the AI client. Not a raw tool name."

First observedSep 24, 2026

TDQS

A4.7/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already establish readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and non-destructive behavior. The description adds meaningful behavioral context beyond those annotations: it returns skill markdown plus display.title/display.summary, does not list slugs or run operations, and functions as a dual-surface playbook rather than a catalog. This is richer than a bare read-only declaration, though it does not address topics like rate limits or auth.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the core action and includes several dense but purposeful sentences that clarify scope, alternatives, and return contents. Every sentence contributes either to the tool's identity or to routing the agent correctly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter, read-only tool with a rich output schema and clear annotations, the description fully covers invocation, scope boundaries, return shape, and sibling routing. Nothing essential is missing for an agent to select and call this tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters and the schema description already states 'No arguments. Send {}' with 100% coverage, so the baseline of 4 applies. The description adds no parameter ambiguity and reinforces that invocation requires no arguments.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action ('Read the agent how-to') and names the artifact it returns (skill markdown plus display fields). It also explicitly distinguishes itself from siblings by saying it is 'not a catalog and not a machine manifest' and by referencing the alternative tools fraggate_list and fraggate_call.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives precise when-to-use guidance: 'starting a session or choosing the door before any catalog call.' It also gives explicit when-not-to-use guidance with named alternatives: listing hashed registry names, hub Software-tab cards, or executing an engine should use fraggate_list, Softwares, or fraggate_call.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Aziel Runtime tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.