Aziel Runtime

Advanced: last session receipt

runtime_session_receipt

Read-onlyIdempotent

[advanced/internal] Read the last receipt only for a raw session — not the full chain. Use this when the user asked for the latest receipt on an open or sealed session. Do not use it for the full receipt chain or product output the user did not ask to audit; use runtime_session_receipts (full chain) or the product display from fraggate_call instead. Does not mutate the session. Unknown id returns session_not_found. An empty receipt list returns receipt=null rather than inventing one. Prefer product output (display) unless the user asked for the chain. session_id or id (aliases) required. No view/limit — this is always the last receipt plus a chain verified flag. Returns the last receipt object (or null) and verified.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`id`	No	Alias of session_id. The door accepts either key; do not send two different values.
`session_id`	Yes	Required. Raw session id from runtime_session_open (sess_ + 32 lowercase hex). Alias: id. Missing both fails with session_id required; unknown id returns session_not_found.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`code`	No	FragGate or fabric code when present: FG-OK, FG-HALLUC-TOOL, FG-STUB, FG-LOCAL-ONLY, FG-UNKNOWN-OP, FG-GATE-REFUSE, FG-LAMB-REFUSE, or a module refuse such as MESH-* / AKM-*.
`door`	No	Door name. The public door is fraggate.
`ran_in`	No	Execution locale (for example aziel-runtime) when present.
`result`	No	Last-receipt body: receipt (or null), verified chain flag, public session. Errors: session_id required, session_not_found.
`status`	No	HTTP-like status when present on wrappers (200 ok; 400+ error / refuse).
`display`	No	Human-facing envelope. Show display.action, title, and summary, then take the next input. Never echo raw tool names.
`receipt`	No	Optional receipt, ledger tip, or TemporalLock/ForgeReceipts exit when the door stamped one.
`refusal`	No	Explicit refuse object, code, or message when the door or engine refused.
`engine_op`	No	Resolved engine op when present (often inside result).
`ledger_tip`	No	Ask/refuse ledger tip when the door stamped one.
`provenance`	No	Provenance / input packet when the pipeline attached one.
`session_id`	No	Raw session id when session plumbing was used. Hidden unless the user asked for the chain.
`engine_slug`	No	Resolved engine slug when present (often inside result).
`limitations`	No	Capability limitations or Remain-OFF notes when present.
`engine_digest`	No	64-hex engine_digest when a true in-process engine ran (often inside result).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed5 schema fields changedSep 27, 2026

changedOutput schema / description

Previous value: -"Display envelope shown to the user (display.title / display.summary) plus the machine result. Extra engine fields may appear."New value: +"Display envelope shown to the user (display.action / display.title / display.summary) plus the machine result. Extra engine fields may appear. Do not echo raw tool names."

changedOutput schema / properties / display / description

Previous value: -"Human-facing envelope. Show title and summary, then take the next input."New value: +"Human-facing envelope. Show display.action, title, and summary, then take the next input. Never echo raw tool names."

addedOutput schema / properties / display / properties / action

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Human-visible run frame. Always \"Run aziel runtime\". Product verb titles stay on title. Not a tool name.",
+  "type": "string"
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / display / properties / image

Added value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": true,
+  "description": "Present only when a real production included png_b64, jpeg_b64 (or the same byte family), or a cited http(s) image URL. No invented thumbs. Omitted on dry_run. reviewed is true only when executed production bytes are attached; a dry_run never mints reviewed.",
+  "properties": {
+    "data": {
+      "description": "Base64 image bytes copied from the production. Omitted for a URL-only cite. Never present on dry_run.",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "mimeType": {
+      "description": "Sniffed image media type (image/png, image/jpeg, image/webp, or image/gif).",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "reviewed": {
+      "description": "True only when data came from an executed production. False for a URL cite without bytes. Never true on dry_run.",
+      "type": "boolean"
+    },
+    "source": {
+      "description": "Production field the image was taken from (for example png_b64, jpeg_b64, or image_url).",
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "url": {
+      "description": "Cited http(s) image URL when the production named one. Not invented.",
+      "type": "string"
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}

changedOutput schema / properties / display / properties / title / description

Previous value: -"Short result title for the AI client."New value: +"Product verb title for the AI client. Not a raw tool name."

First observedSep 24, 2026

TDQS

A4.9/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds valuable behavioral context beyond annotations: it does not mutate the session, unknown ids return session_not_found, and an empty receipt list returns receipt=null rather than inventing one. It also clarifies there is no view/limit and that a chain verified flag accompanies the result.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is longer than average, but every sentence earns its place: purpose, usage, exclusions, alternatives, side-effect safety, error semantics, parameter aliasing, and return shape are all covered without fluff. The most important scoping information is front-loaded in the first sentence.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity, the presence of an output schema, and the sibling set, the description is complete. It covers selection criteria, exclusions, error behavior, empty-result behavior, parameter requirements, and output shape, leaving no practical gap for an agent deciding whether and how to call it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents both session_id and id thoroughly. The description adds useful semantic guidance by confirming the aliases are interchangeable, warning against sending two different values, and explicitly stating that no view/limit parameter exists. This goes slightly beyond the schema but does not need to carry the full burden.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb and resource: 'Read the last receipt only for a raw session — not the full chain.' It explicitly distinguishes this tool from the sibling runtime_session_receipts by contrasting 'last receipt only' with 'full chain,' so an agent can tell them apart immediately.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives explicit when-to-use guidance ('when the user asked for the latest receipt on an open or sealed session') and explicit when-not-to-use guidance with named alternatives: runtime_session_receipts for the full chain and fraggate_call for product display. It also adds a clear preference rule: 'Prefer product output (display) unless the user asked for the chain.'

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Aziel Runtime tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.