Skip to main content
Glama

TokenBel Financial Data

search_by_ticker

Read-onlyIdempotent

Search BCSE exchange-listed shares and bonds by ticker (case-insensitive substring match). Tokens are excluded because they do not have ticker symbols. Use the returned uuid value as an opaque TokenBel internal id (usually 8 hex chars, not an RFC UUID) with share_get_by_uuid/bond_get_by_uuid, share_payouts_get for share rows, or trading_stats_get for either share/bond row. Returns entity_type, ticker, issuer_uuid, issuer_name, and is_trading (traded today).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoMax results (1-100, default 20)
queryYesTicker search query for listed shares/bonds only (case-insensitive substring, e.g. 'MTB' matches 'MTBank')

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
countYes
queryYes
resultsYes

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations (readOnlyHint, idempotentHint) are already present; description adds meaningful context: case-insensitive substring match, uuid format (opaque 8 hex char id), and return fields including is_trading.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, front-loaded with purpose, every sentence earns its place with no unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple search tool with output schema, the description fully explains input parameters, output fields, token exclusion, and how to use the results with other tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%; description repeats parameter descriptions but adds an example ('MTB' matches 'MTBank') and context about token exclusion, which is already implied. Minimal added value beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it searches BCSE exchange-listed shares and bonds by ticker with case-insensitive substring matching, and explicitly excludes tokens, distinguishing it from sibling tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit guidance on when to use (ticker search), what not to use (tokens excluded), and how to use the returned uuid with specific other tools like share_get_by_uuid and bond_get_by_uuid.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct entity or operation: bonds, shares, tokens, companies, issuers, currency rates, news, and searches. No two tools have overlapping purposes; even similar tools like bond_list and company_bonds_list are clearly differentiated by scope (global vs per-company).

Naming Consistency4/5

Tools mostly follow a pattern of entity_noun + verb (e.g., bond_list, share_get_by_uuid, company_bonds_list). Some exceptions like currency_rate_get and entity_news_list place the verb at the end, but the pattern is predictable and readable.

Tool Count5/5

With 19 tools covering bonds, shares, tokens, companies, issuers, currency rates, news, and trading statistics, the number is well-calibrated to the domain. Each tool serves a clear purpose without redundancy.

Completeness5/5

The tool surface provides comprehensive read access to the financial data domain: search, retrieval, listing with filters, trading statistics, and news. All expected query operations are present, and no obvious gaps are apparent for a data provider.

Resources