TokenBel Financial Data

company_bonds_list

Read-onlyIdempotent

List summary cards of a company's active bonds. Accepts a company OR issuer TokenBel id; resolves the company and returns its bonds.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`uuid`	Yes	TokenBel internal identifier: opaque hexadecimal string, usually 8 characters such as "78c7e502"; despite uuid field/tool names, it is not an RFC UUID and normally has no hyphens. Company or issuer id, usually discovered via search_by_name.
`limit`	No	Max results per page (default 50).
`cursor_uuid`	No	TokenBel internal identifier: opaque hexadecimal string, usually 8 characters such as "78c7e502"; despite uuid field/tool names, it is not an RFC UUID and normally has no hyphens. Opaque cursor id part from the next_cursor returned by a prior call; pass both cursor parts together.
`cursor_created_at`	No	Opaque cursor datetime part (ISO 8601) from the next_cursor returned by a prior call; pass both cursor parts together.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`bonds`	Yes
`count`	Yes
`limit`	Yes
`issuer_name`	Yes
`issuer_uuid`	Yes
`next_cursor`	Yes
`company_name`	Yes
`company_uuid`	Yes	TokenBel internal identifier: opaque hexadecimal string, usually 8 characters such as "78c7e502"; despite uuid field names, it is not an RFC UUID and normally has no hyphens.
`requested_uuid`	Yes	TokenBel internal identifier: opaque hexadecimal string, usually 8 characters such as "78c7e502"; despite uuid field names, it is not an RFC UUID and normally has no hyphens.
`requested_entity_type`	Yes

TDQS

A3.6/5.0

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint and idempotentHint. The description adds that it resolves the company, which is useful context but does not contradict annotations. No additional behavioral details beyond what annotations and schema provide.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences, front-loaded with the verb 'List'. Every word is meaningful with no redundancy. Achieves high information density in minimal space.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema and comprehensive parameter descriptions, the description sufficiently explains the tool's core functionality. It covers the input (company/issuer id) and output (bonds), though could mention pagination behavior briefly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so parameters are well-documented. The description slightly clarifies the uuid parameter by mentioning it can be a company or issuer id, but this is already implied in the schema description. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it lists summary cards of a company's active bonds, distinguishing it from sibling tools like bond_get_by_uuid (single bond) and bond_list (likely all bonds). The verb 'List' and resource 'company's active bonds' are specific.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use vs alternatives. While it mentions accepting a company or issuer id, it doesn't explain when to prefer this over bond_list or other tools. Lacks explicit when-not-to-use or alternative tool references.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All TokenBel Financial Data tools Inspect

Try in Browser

RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct entity or operation: bonds, shares, tokens, companies, issuers, currency rates, news, and searches. No two tools have overlapping purposes; even similar tools like bond_list and company_bonds_list are clearly differentiated by scope (global vs per-company).

Naming Consistency4/5

Tools mostly follow a pattern of entity_noun + verb (e.g., bond_list, share_get_by_uuid, company_bonds_list). Some exceptions like currency_rate_get and entity_news_list place the verb at the end, but the pattern is predictable and readable.

Tool Count5/5

With 19 tools covering bonds, shares, tokens, companies, issuers, currency rates, news, and trading statistics, the number is well-calibrated to the domain. Each tool serves a clear purpose without redundancy.

Completeness5/5

The tool surface provides comprehensive read access to the financial data domain: search, retrieval, listing with filters, trading statistics, and news. All expected query operations are present, and no obvious gaps are apparent for a data provider.

Resources

Need Help?