Read one public VibeDesign template by slug, absolute URL or localized path.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | No | Absolute template URL or localized path. | |
| path | No | Template path, for example /ru/vibe-design/makety/example/. | |
| slug | No | Template slug. | |
| locale | No | ru |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It correctly implies read-only behavior ('Read') but does not disclose other behavioral traits like error handling on not found, authentication requirements, rate limits, or whether the template is truly public. This leaves gaps for the agent.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, concise sentence of 10 words that front-loads the primary purpose. Every word is functional, with no redundancy or filler.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple read tool with no output schema and 0 required parameters, the description is adequate but incomplete. It does not explain the return value structure, how to differentiate between the three identifier methods, or when locale matters. Sibling tools exist but are not referenced.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 75% (3 of 4 params have descriptions). The description summarizes the parameters as 'by slug, absolute URL or localized path', which adds little beyond the schema. It does not clarify the relationship between parameters or how locale interacts with the identifying params. Baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action 'Read', the resource 'one public VibeDesign template', and the three identification methods (slug, absolute URL, localized path). It distinguishes this tool from siblings like 'search_design_templates' (which searches) and 'get_article' (different resource).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description does not provide any guidance on when to use this tool vs. alternatives, such as when to use slug vs. url vs. path, or when to use the search tool instead. No explicit context on prerequisites or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: get for single items, list for collections, search for finding, and recommend for project-based suggestions. No two tools have overlapping purposes.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (e.g., get_article, search_skills). The verbs and nouns are clearly descriptive and uniform across the set.
With 9 tools, the set is well-scoped for a public knowledge server covering articles, design templates, and AI skills. Each tool serves a clear role without redundancy or overload.
The tool set provides comprehensive read and search operations for all three content types, plus a recommendation feature. Minor gaps exist, such as no listing of all articles by section or pagination support, but core workflows are covered.
