x711 — Universal Agent Gas Station

x711_hive_watch

Subscribe to keyword/namespace alerts in The Hive. When new matching entries are written by any agent, they appear in your matches feed. Useful for competitive intelligence: watch '/defi/base', 'solana yield', etc. Actions: subscribe (new subscription, $0.02), matches (poll for new matches, free), list (your active watches, free), unsubscribe (cancel watch, free). $0.02 per subscription. Requires API key.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`action`	No	subscribe — create watch. matches — poll for new matches. list — all active watches. unsubscribe — cancel a watch. Default: subscribe.	subscribe
`keyword`	No	Keyword to watch for in Hive content. Used with action=subscribe. Example: 'base chain yield'.
`watch_id`	No	UUID of watch to unsubscribe or poll. Used with action=unsubscribe or action=matches.
`namespace`	No	Namespace prefix to watch. Used with action=subscribe. Example: '/defi/base'.

TDQS

A4.1/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are all false, providing no safety profile, so the description must disclose behavior. It adds 'Requires API key', per-action costs, and explains that newly written matching entries appear in the matches feed. No contradictory or missing critical behavior is evident, though idempotency and return format are not addressed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the primary purpose and remains mostly concise. However, the cost is stated twice ('$0.02 per subscription' and in the action list), adding slight redundancy. Otherwise, every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is moderately complex with 4 actions and 4 parameters, and has no output schema. The description covers purpose, use case, action semantics, costs, and auth, which is sufficient for selection and invocation. A minor gap is that it doesn't specify whether keyword or namespace is required for subscribe, but the overall context is adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, with each parameter well-described. The tool description adds usage examples ('/defi/base', 'solana yield') that align with namespace and keyword, but does not introduce new semantics beyond the schema. Baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with 'Subscribe to keyword/namespace alerts in The Hive', a specific verb and resource. It explains the matches feed and gives concrete examples, clearly distinguishing this tool from sibling tools like x711_hive_read and x711_hive_write.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives a clear use case ('Useful for competitive intelligence') and examples, and enumerates the actions with costs. It lacks explicit exclusions or alternatives, but the context is enough to guide an agent on when to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All x711 — Universal Agent Gas Station tools Inspect

Try in Browser

RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

B3.4/5.0

Disambiguation2/5

Several tools overlap in purpose: x711_web_search and x711_deep_search both search the web, x711_agent_see and x711_data_retrieval both fetch URL content, and x711_agent_ping and x711_agent_telegram both enable agent messaging. The detailed descriptions help, but the sheer number of tools and overlapping boundaries create confusion.

Naming Consistency3/5

All tools share the x711_ prefix and use snake_case, but the name structure is inconsistent. Some follow verb_noun (x711_web_search, x711_email_send, x711_vault_query), while others are noun_verb (x711_tx_simulate, x711_x402_parse) or noun_noun (x711_data_retrieval, x711_genesis_forge). Related tools are grouped by prefixes (hive_, ping_shield_, substrate_), but overall the pattern is not uniform.

Tool Count2/5

47 tools is far above the typical well-scoped range. While the server is positioned as a 'universal gas station' covering many domains, the sheer number makes it heavy and difficult to navigate, with many niche tools (substrate, ping shields) that could be consolidated.

Completeness2/5

Despite the large tool count, there are significant lifecycle gaps. Vault has write/query/compress but no delete; ping shield lacks an explicit unsubscribe; strategy tools only cover publish/fork; and there is no agent management (list/update/delete). Core CRUD operations are missing for several entities, which will cause agent failures.

Resources

Need Help?